Monday, 12 March 2012

Safer in more towns

Blackpool is set to follow St Helens, Wigan and Leigh by establishing a Safer in Town centre scheme aimed at increasing the safety and confidence of people with learning difficulties.

Since November last year, campaigning voluntary group St Helens People’s Choice, with the backing of the local Hate Crime Partnership, has issued participants with key rings and fold out cards to participating people with learning difficulties.


Alongside the scheme’s logo these incorporate drawings of buses, £ signs, intimidating characters and  police cars. This means that anyone with communication difficulties can indicate what is concerning them when they enter public buildings, shops, cafes and pubs that display a matching window sticker to demonstrate the venue can offer support in cases of an accident, harassment or crime.

St Helens People’s Choice, a self-organised group of people with learning difficulties, was established in 1994. According to its chairperson, John Horan, “no-one has yet needed to use the town centre scheme but to make sure it will work when it’s needed we have undertaken many practice runs in which people have lost their money, complain of being bullied or of feeling unwell. The response of venues has been good. We established Safer in Town because one of our members suffered serious harassment by young people over many months and had no-one to turn to.”

Horan said 80 venues had signed up to the scheme, which has been replicated in Wigan and Leigh since January this year. Now, Blackpool has established a working group – consisting of councillors, police and local businesses - to develop its own Safer in Town project that aims to expand support to anyone in problems, particularly older people.

The aim is to launch the scheme before the busy summer season. It’s coordinator, Stephen Brookes, a disabled rights campaigner who lives in the seaside resort, says “The idea is simple and effective, and makes life easier for disabled and older people who can be intimidated by the fast pace of Blackpool.” 


Businesses he said would benefit from being recognised as a safe haven and he felt that many more towns and cities would benefit from similar schemes.


Stop press 


Halifax is the latest town to announce a similar scheme will be established shortly.


Tuesday, 6 March 2012

Camera operator/video editor required for short non-broadcast documentary (subject to securing funding)


Camera operator/video editor required for short non-broadcast documentary  (subject to securing funding) 

The documentary director, Mark Metcalf, is applying to a charitable Foundation for funding for a 15-minute non-broadcast documentary about the impact of incinerators on infant mortality and health. The documentary is intended for screening at public meetings, the Houses of Parliament, on social media, and to send on DVD to MPs and local councillors. 

Mark is looking for a camera operator and video editor whose work history details he can include in the funding application. Employment is conditional on the success of the funding application.

The camera operator would also record sound direct to camera during the 5-6 day shoot. This would take place in the Midlands, the South East and the North of England. Free accommodation, meals and transport would be provided.

One person who is skilled in both areas could carry out the camera operator/video editor roles. Ideally s/he will have their own equipment to do both pieces of work, but open to discussion if this is not the case.

The production would be fully insured.

BECTU Rates of pay at £309 for a 10-hour day. S/he will be employed on a freelance basis, and the work will either be in June or October, depending upon when the funding application is made.

Mark is a freelance journalist who has written extensively about elevated levels of infant mortality and poor health amongst all ages, in neighbourhoods downwind of incinerators. Now the Health Protection Agency has commissioned a study into the issue. 


Monday, 5 March 2012

Fit to print interview with Michelle Stanistreet, NUJ General Secretary


Taken from current edition of the Big Issue in the North magazine - buy the magazine, it's a good read and helps people improve their lives. 

Liverpool born Michelle Stanistreet has faced a baptism of fire since taking over as the General Secretary of the National Union of Journalists in July last year. The Leveson Inquiry, two 24-hour strikes at the BBC, the News of the World closure and numerous regional disputes over redundancies and wage cuts all demonstrate a serious crisis in the press industry, heightened by the contempt many of the public feel towards those who work in it.

None of which appears to have dampened the enthusiasm of the 37-year-old mother of one young boy, who is the first woman to head up the NUJ in its 105-year-old existence. Having cut her teeth fighting her own employer, Richard Desmond at the Express Newspapers group, over what she describes as “inaccurate and racially inflammatory coverage of immigration issues” she now wants a conscience clause for all journalists, a code of conduct for the industry, tougher regulations and a change in media ownership. She’s convinced that these will help create a future for the press and papers in this country.

One paper that only has a past is the News of the World. Stanistreet had just finished her first week at the NUJ when James Murdoch announced its closure after 168-years in existence. Despite father Rupert having long ago locked out, de-recognised and refused to talk to the print unions and the NUJ, Stanistreet was “deeply unhappy as it was a cynical act of self-preservation that meant closing a paper that was not in any financial difficulties. It’s always a sad day when any national, regional or local paper shuts up shop. We had individual members at the paper, and like hundreds of others they’ve lost their livelihoods in order for Murdoch to try and protect his top group of executives”.

Not that Stanistreet, the daughter of a policeman, supports the methods, including phone-tapping, that were employed by some journalists to gather stories for what was Britain’s biggest selling Sunday at 2.7 million copies an issue

She has said so at the Leveson Inquiry into the culture, ethics and practices of the British media. Initially the NUJ were refused core participant status.
“We feared the voice of journalists was to be drowned out by the views of the big media bosses and their expensive legal teams. Fortunately, common sense prevailed and we raised our campaigning issues such as ownership, an industry wide code of conduct and a conscience clause for journalists,” says Stanistreet.

All of which would have been helpful when she worked from 1999 onwards at the Express Newspapers group, where she started on the business section of the Daily Express before working her way up to become books editor.

Under new owner, porn king Richard Desmond, the Daily Star and Sunday and Daily Express all regularly ran articles on immigration that had the journalists who had written them complaining of being so heavily edited that “they were wildly inaccurate, unethical and poisonous” says Stanistreet, who by 2001 had become the elected senior union rep at the papers. 

She had hoped that two complaints to the Press Complaints Commission [PCC] would see improvements. However when the regulatory body - on grounds that complaints had to come from those specifically lambasted in the pieces - refused to even investigate, the decision added to the NUJ’s concerns and which now has the organisation calling for the PCC to be disbanded.

Says Stanistreet “It is an old boys club which is too heavily influenced by the views of the media owners and newspaper editors. We need a fresh organisation that includes other interested bodies, including consumers – the public - and those who provide the content – the journalists. ”.

There are a lot less of the latter than a few years back. New technology, and the rise of citizen journalism, combined with widespread public cynicism have sent sales of newspapers rocketing downwards. Across the UK, newspaper circulation fell by over a quarter between 2007 and 2011. The current economic crisis means further falls are inevitable.

Regional newspapers have taken big hits. The 157-year-old Liverpool Daily Post lost 28% of its sales in 2010 and when it fell below 9,000 a day its owners Trinity Mirror began by scrapping the Saturday edition and then in January this year the paper became a weekly.

The Yorkshire Evening Post has also suffered, sales dropping 10% in 2010 and according to Ashley Highfield, new chief executive at its parent company Johnston Press the future of regional publishing lies ‘beyond print…..as a disseminator of information whether that means print, online, iPads, phones and possibly even local television”.

Stanistreet believes the crisis is largely due to “the bankrupt business model  controlling the industry. Big media groups have had handsome profits for many years. Rather than taking smaller profits, they have cynically cut costs by making workers redundant and reducing pay. This cuts quality, makes things less local and relevant to readers, thus reducing sales even further. Media ownership needs changing, especially as it’s too valuable for democracy to rest under the control of so few people”.

One media outlet that isn’t privately owned is the BBC.  A 20% cut from its budget is set to see 2,000 staff made redundant or not replaced by 2017. Just over a year ago the NUJ supported two one-day strikes by workers there, and Stanistreet says “they would do so again as the cuts are politically motivated because the Tories pre-election policy involved backing Murdoch. Hence they supported the BSkyB takeover by News Corporation last year and which was only abandoned after the full extent of the phone hacking scandal became known. The BBC deal was done behind closed doors in record time, just 2-3 days. The losers are viewers and ordinary journalists. Not those at the top of the corporation”.

The NUJ has many members at the BBC, which isn’t so in other parts of the press. Stanistreet believes the Leveson Inquiry will help in getting some journalists to join as “they can see how we are sticking up for quality journalism by exposing the climate in which many are working. In lots of newsrooms there is bullying and improving an article by challenging an editor’s view can threaten someone’s livelihood. Without a union there is no structure to improve things and ensure we have a media that properly informs the public of what’s going on in society”.








Newcastle United silenced by Sunderland fans

Derby match at St James' Park and the Geordies can manage to raise just two chants during the whole game to silence the Sunderland fans. First, on nine minutes there's a tremendous chant of "Stand Up if you Hate Sunderland, and then 82 minutes later there's another ear splitting "You're not singing anymore." Ignoring the fact that the latter wasn't true the chant should really have been directed towards themselves - sixth in the League, a packed crowd and totally outsung by 2,500 travelling fans! There were some Newcastle lads singing next to us [i've no idea what they were singing as i could and never actually heard them the whole 90 minutes] and when we sang 'your support is shit' i swear some of them clapped in agreement!

Newcastle fan's support for their team at home is pathetic. And to my great surprise that is the same with the numbers travelling away. I was shocked to discover that in October - when Newcastle were third in the League - they took 743 to Stoke on a Monday night. On Boxing Day at Bolton they had 600 less than Sunderland took in October - when Sunderland were 18th in the League. Manchester City away - just 1,685. It's difficult to make direct comparisons as both teams still have away games to play but at the moment Sunderland are a good few hundred ahead per match in away attendances.

Crown Prosecution Service workshop on reporting disabled hate crime


Manchester will host the Crown Prosecution Service’s first workshop on breaking down the barriers to reporting disabled hate crime. If successful it will go nationwide.

Charities, action groups and community networks will discover what advice and support they can offer potential victims of hate crime.

Under the Criminal Justice Act 2003, a disability hate crime is a criminal offence motivated by hatred or prejudice towards a person because of their actual or perceived disability.

High-profile cases involving disability hate crime include that of 38-year-old Fiona Pilkington who, after years of being tormented by a gang of youths in Leicestershire, killed herself and her 18-year-old severely disabled daughter Francecca Hardwick in 2007.

Successful prosecutions for disabled hate crimes have risen over the last four years, increasing from 68 between April and September 2007 to 579 in 2010-11.

According to Stephen Brookes, a coordinator of the Disability Hate Crime Network with over 2,000 facebook members, this good news “should be built upon, it indicates people are more confident of reporting crimes to the police and the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) is better at prosecuting them. However many crimes go unreported.” Some studies suggest by as much as 95% and when Mencap in 2000 investigated the lives of people with learning disabilities they found nine out of ten had been harassed or attacked within the previous year.

A CPS spokesperson said they were aware that one potential barrier to tackling disability hate crime “is the uncertainty around what might constitute one, a fear of not being believed or because it happens ‘to someone else.’ We can help agencies by outlining the prosecution process including what evidence is required and what support is available for victims and witnesses.” Brookes has called for disabled people’s organisations left disappointed by the police in the past “to actively engage as the door is open for collaborative working.” 

Thursday, 1 March 2012

Pakistan calling - 15 articles on developments there


A whole host of good articles from Pakistan by Yasir Ali

Journalist Yasir Ali has just moved to Britain. He are some of his articles from the last few years. Yasir is intending continuing to pursue his journalism career here and is seeking to join the National Union of Journalists.

1)  Modern Slavery Alive in Pakistan’s Brick Kilns


2) A Pakistani woman’s battle to stay alive


3)  Pakistan Struggle to contain dengue fever


4)   Pakistani Journalist demand killers be brought to justice


5)    Pakistan is in Mourning


6)  Pakistani minister assassinated


7)   Pakistani Hindus denied marriages and fuenral rights



8) Pakistan Special tailor


9)  Pakistan Rat Children


10) A community under siege in tribal Pakistan


11) Pakistani Journalist in dilemma



12)  Somali refugees in Pakistan rally for greater assistance 


13)  Afghan children working in dumps 


Opinion Page

1)          Democracy Betrayal


2)       Ambassador of Muslim-Hindu unity



Bury's record gate - March 1st 1900


112 years ago today, Bury had their largest crowd for a replayed FA Cup match with Sheffield United, the first match having finished 2-2 at Bramall Lane.




1900 FA Cup Third Round replay
Thursday March 1st 1900

Having given themselves a great chance of making the semi-finals of the FA Cup for the first time Bury were assured of a good crowd for the replay. In fact events off the pitch, thousands of miles away in South Africa, transpired to create what is almost certainly the largest crowd ever seen at Gigg Lane, beating even the record gate of 35,000 that was set sixty years later for another FA Cup game, this time against Bolton Wanderers.

Great rejoicing had accompanied the news received on the evening of February 28th that the siege of Ladysmith in South Africa had been ended after 118 days of increasing privation amongst the inhabitants, the Boers having failed to breach the town’s defences. The news came only weeks after the slaughter at the Spion Kop. 


Bury 2
Thompson, Darroch and Davidson, Pray, Leeming and Ross, Richards, Wood, McLuckie, Sagar and Plant

Scorers - Richards - 65 minutes, Plant - 75 mins

Sheffield United 0
Foulke, Boyle and Thickett, Johnson, Morren, Needham, Priest, Almond, Hedley, Beers and Bennett


Referee - Mr Scragg of Crewe
Half-time 0-0
Attendance - 20,139
Receipts £686 9s 6d

The description of the pre-match scenes are taken from the Bury Guardian

The Red Rose is triumphant, and the biggest crowd that ever assembled at Shakerville witnessed the splendid victory of Lancashire’s only hope.

The town was literally taken by storm on Thursday, and after the railway trials had been overcome the invaders, who proved a very mobile force indeed, as they did the distance between the stations and the ground in record time, attacked the entrances to the ground, and as a result of the unprecedented pressure brought to bear upon the gates they, in their eagerness, waxed impatient at what they deemed the insufficiently quick surrender of the tickets, and forthwith proceeded to storm the citadel, escalading the walls and, overcoming the strenuous opposition of the defenders [police and officials], rushed into the grounds without depositing the accustomed silver.

As the defaulters, animated by the spirit of mischievous success, scaled the division to the shilling enclosure, and despite a sound belabouring by the sticks of the inspector and police in charge [and the wielders were no chickens] scores got over, securing better positions.

The takings were over £200 higher than the previous best at the ground [£465 in the Bury - Bolton Wanderers’ fiasco some years ago] totting up to £686 9s 6d.

The relief of Ladysmith came in very opportunely, and as all Lancashire celebrated the achievement in which their representative Fusiliers have taken such a noble part and have suffered so much by a general holiday, and as there was only one big event on in the county that afternoon, it necessarily followed that the Gigg Lane enclosure was the centre of gravitation.

Tis a pity the ground was not bigger, as many hundreds - one estimate puts it at 20,000 - were unable to obtain admission. It is practically certain that had the accommodation been adequate to the demands made upon it there would have been a thousand pound gate.

The enthusiasm, military and football, simply bubbled over, and it is very many years since such a scene was witnessed in Bury. Hundreds travelled long distances to see the match and then failed to get either a sight of it or admission into the grounds, while very many others had to take their view of the match by proxy. It meant enterprising climbers invaded the trees overlooking the ground.


Sheffield were the first out and had to make themselves through the assembled throng, and when they were followed by Bury a great cheer could be heard many miles away with some of the spectators waving small Union Jacks. Pray won the toss and set Needham’s men to face the wind.

From the off Bury pushed forward and Boyle was in smartly to clear the ball. Foulke, showing admirable athleticism for such a big man was down smartly to block Plant’s shot, and then as Richards and Wood opened up the Sheffield defence only a last gasp Boyle tackle prevented the opening goal. Foulke punched away two crosses when challenged in the air before Thickett was injured and was helped from the field after a tackle with Richards. Although he later returned he was to all intents and purposes a passenger for the remainder of the game. With Bury in fine form it would have been difficult enough for the away side with eleven men, but with just the ten the task was always going to be too great.

Bury pressed and Ross thought he had opened the scoring only to be denied by a great Foulke save. Sagar was then able to weave his way past the Sheffield defence only to face the formidable frame of Foulke who dived down on the ball. The away side required desperate defending, and there was relief when McLuckie’s shot beat Foulke but landed in the great crowd behind the goal.

As half time approached Sheffield were able to mount there first serious attempt on the Bury goal, but Priest fashioning on to a Beers shot missed badly when left with only Thompson to beat. When the referee’s whistle thus sounded the score at half time was goalless.

At the start of the second period the away side were further handicapped when a strong sun came out direct into their eyes. Needham blocked Sagar’s shot, two corners were scrambled clear and Davidson had his powerful free-kick blocked by the powerful hands of Foulke, the ball rocketing back to the half way line. The Sheffield keeper was by now being wildly cheered by the Bury faithful as for the next few minutes it was more a case of eleven on to one - admittedly it was a big one! Amazingly the keeper then almost helped his side take the lead - thumping a goal kick into the Bury half where Almond flicked it over his head and turned to see the ball touched round the post by Thompson.

Ross, Leeming and Sagar reasserted Bury’s superiority with shots that Foulke beat away. The question was - could anyone beat him? When they did Boyle kicked clear a shot from the goal line. Richards shot just wide before, at last, the great man was beaten when Wood and Richards combined down the Bury right and Richards opened the scoring amidst tremendous enthusiasm. With Needham needing treatment Sheffield were reduced to ten men, one of whom was injured and the game would have been all over if Leeming’s shot had been inches lower, the ball crashing back off the crossbar.

Foulke denied plant, but the keeper had no chance when Wood dashing down the left found Plant who headed the ball home. Although there was still quarter of an hour to go Sheffield were well beaten and their defeat would have been even heavier if Foulke hadn’t continued to play brilliantly right up to the final whistle. The keeper had been the man of the match but his side had lost 2-0 and the folk of Bury had double reason to celebrate one of its most famous days.


Take from ALL SHOOK UP - Bury FC's amazing Cup story - FA Cup Winners 1900 and 1903, published by Empire Publications 


Bury beat Southampton 4-0 in the 1900 FA Cup Final