190 years ago today a bill to abolish the 1799/1800
Combination Acts was passed by the House of Commons.
The end of the 18th century had seen employers
increasing their capital, with greater investment in plant and machinery. For
the first time, by combining workers had a weapon that could hurt the superior
forces of class and privilege. Combination was already illegal but the new laws
offered a faster application of the law by providing for a trial before a
Justice of the Peace (Magistrate) rather than wait for an assize. Although the
Acts forbade combinations amongst employees and employers it was never used
against the latter. When the employers began cutting wages and a few brave
workers walked out they found themselves up before the Magistrates and imprisoned.
Tin plate workers in the Wolverhampton ‘great strike’ of 1819 were arrested,
tried, found guilty and transported to Tasmania. This did not prevent other
workers taking action, often successfully after their masters refused to use
the law.
In response to the attacks on their rights to collectively
organise, workers continuously presented petitions to Parliament, but with no
workers’ representatives the support from MPs was extremely limited. There were
even moves by William Wilberforce to make the combination laws more drastic.
In the early 1820s, two MPs, Francis Place and Joseph Hume
were successful in getting a Select Committee of Inquiry to examine the
workings of the Combination Acts. This recommended repeal, which was carried
out between 25 May and 5 June 1824.
It did not take the employers long to hit back. Workers organised
‘closed shops’ and demands for wage increases were backed up with strikes. A
frightened ruling class demanded restoration of the combination laws. The result
was a strengthening of the Conspiracy Laws in 1825, again limiting combinations
and leaving trade union funds unprotected with their members liable to be sued
for breach of contract. Picketing was made illegal and the employers again
moved to prevent collective bargaining.
No comments:
Post a Comment