Friday, 19 April 2013

Sunderland continue to deny Di Canio is a fascist


Letter from Margaret Byrne to a fan. 

First of all I am very concerned to hear about the abuse which you have received. That is totally unacceptable and I strongly believe that all sides in this debate should proceed with it lawfully and civilly. On the basis of what you say it seems to us that reporting the abuse to the police would be a prudent step.
As regards the ‘moral duties’ to which you refer our position is as follows:
We consider that all people have the right to hold and express opinions (provided of course that the expression of those opinions is not abusive). We also believe that those expressing opinions should seek to understand the facts to which those opinions relate and also the position taken by others in the debate. In respect of Paolo we do believe that if those concerned understood the true position, that he is neither a fascist nor a racist, they would not be distressed by this appointment.
As articulated in our Equality Policy - http://www.safc.com/the-club/about-us/equal-opportunities - the Club considers that all aspects of equality, including anti-racism, are very important. However, beyond this, we do not believe that it is a role of a football club to take a leading position to oppose a particular creed. Of course that does not mean that we should be indifferent to political matters or to political views expressed by anyone engaged by the club. However, no-one has identified to us any matter relating to Paolo (based on facts) which would call into question his position with the club (bearing in mind the accusation that he is a fascist is not in fact correct). My role and that of the Board is to act in the best interests of the Club at all times and we believe that by appointing Paolo we have done exactly that.
We deplore any abuse of social media and message boards. However we cannot accept a general responsibility to police the activities of our fans on the internet. 
We are in no doubt that people can properly support Sunderland AFC while still opposing this – or indeed any other – appointment. However we do hope that whatever the differences on this issue our fans will get behind the team for the season run-in. 
I hope this addresses your points. We are acutely aware of the issues which the appointment of Paolo has raised but believe that the concerns which have arisen have been based on misunderstandings.

Tuesday, 16 April 2013

What is fascism?


What is fascism? 

Long live death! Down with intelligence! 

So said General Millan Astray, first commander of the Spanish Foreign Legion, and a major figure in Franco’s regime in Spain.

With fascism the basis of society is inequality. Racism and sexism are to be dogmas. Law exists to enforce the will of the state, which has absolute power. Government authority comes from its status as a superior, self-appointed elite. Reason is abolished in favour of mindless obedience which Hitler called ‘sleepwalking’ and progress is neither possible nor desirable. Dissent is to be exterminated. Human life is a pawn in the hands of the state.

The Sunderland manager Paolo Di Canio is a fascist.  

Thursday, 11 April 2013

Update on Nelson Mandela Foundation


From: MARK METCALF [mailto:markcmetcalf@btinternet.com]
Sent: 09 April 2013 03:18 PM
To: Lee Davies
Subject: Re: Why did we march to free nelson mandela when you now stab us in the back?
 
Dear Mr Davies,
 
Thank you for responding to my earlier email. I hope you don’t mind but I have consulted with my good friend, Graeme Atkinson, before replying. Graeme is a fellow Sunderland fan of many years and is also the European editor of Hope Not Hate. http://www.hopenothate.org.uk
 
Graeme strongly agrees with the sentiments of what I have to say and I have added his name to mine at the bottom. Please treat this letter as therefore coming from both of us. 
 
I am more than happy to make a telephone call to the Foundation if you can assure me that you will record my views (I am happy to put them in writing) and will make them available on-line to your readers and members. I will do the same at this end and make them as widely available as possible.
 
I would also like you to approach the call with as open a mind as possible and be willing to explore the possibility that the decision to maintain a link with SAFC may be a wrong one. 
 
I am aware of Mr Di Canio's statement. I do not trust his word. His history tells me a different story, of a man who admires Mussolini and who just three years ago attended the funeral of a mass murderer/killer/bomber who killed 85 people. In his press conference after the game at Chelsea on Sunday he also made pretty clear why he has opportunistically tried to distance himself from his past. 
 
 
To be honest I am at a loss why any organisation would want to have a link with a body that allows such a man to be its most prominent spokesperson/representative. 
 
You say you want to work with Sunderland on Human Rights and tackling racism. Perhaps I can ask what this work will consist of? Can I ask whether you would consider going back to the club and getting them to include within your work fascism and specifically (especially as it is the talk of the town and the surrounding areas) Mussolini? 
 
I have been a Sunderland fan since the 1960s - or rather I was a fan as I am not going with a fascist in charge - and during this time I have argued with many fans over racism and fascism. I can recall getting stick for wearing a Free Nelson Mandela t-shirt in the 1980s and being accused of supporting terrorism. I still wore the t-shirt and I supported Mr Mandela in his long battle for freedom. I celebrated wildly when he was released. It meant a lot to me and to other anti-racists in Britain like myself. I cannot recall Sunderland Football Club doing a single thing to help his release and in fact during the 1980s the club was run by a great fan of Margaret Thatcher, who was no friend of black freedom in your country. 
 
Sunderland Football club appears to have no senior black staff. In a country in which around 1 in 12 people are black or ethnic minority then does this not strike you as a little odd? If you take a look at the club's junior set-up, then are there any black kids involved? Take a look at the coaching staff and those that have gone before them. They will be white. Is the NMF going to ask the club to take on-board its own racism and tackle the fact it has no black staff within the administrative apparatus? 
 
Why am i putting these things in print? Because I can tell you from my experiences of the last 35-40 years as a Sunderland fan and an anti-racist that you will be giving credibility to fascism and racism if you do not make a stand and withdraw your links with the club. I can assure you that you will be making it more difficult for those (relatively) few of us who are anti-racists to win the arguments with the racists and fascists at the match and in the street. They will say: "Look even the NMF and the likes of Show Racism the Red Card are working with the club." The club needs you more than you need them and that's a fact. 
 
 
Mark Metcalf
 
 
Graeme Atkinson
 
 

From: Lee Davies <LeeD@nelsonmandela.org>
To: "markcmetcalf@btinternet.com" <markcmetcalf@btinternet.com>
Sent: Friday, 5 April 2013, 22:11
Subject: RE: Why did we march to free nelson mandela when you now stab us in the back?
 
Good evening Mark,
 
Thank you for your e-mail. Please see the statement we issued earlier this week, as well as the statement issued by Mr. di Canio. Should you subsequently wish to discuss this matter further we will gladly set up a call with Mr. Sello Hatang, Head of our Communications and Outreach programme, on Monday. 
 
Update on the Centre of Memory’s partnership with Sunderland AFC:

 
2 April 2013
 
The Nelson Mandela Centre of Memory and the management of Sunderland Football Club met in England on Monday, 1 April 2013 to discuss the public debates around Sunderland’s new coach. Mr Di Canio participated in the meeting.
 
The Centre recently entered into a partnership with the club designed to promote the legacy of our Founder, Nelson Mandela, and to help ensure the future sustainability of the Centre. At the heart of the partnership is a commitment to our Founder’s values with a special focus on human rights and anti-racism.

At the meeting on Monday, Sunderland reaffirmed its commitment to these values and the ethos of the partnership. It must be stressed that the Centre’s relationship is with the club, not with any individual in the club.
 
Statement from Paolo Di Canio:
 
 
Published: 03 April, 2013
by Sunderland AFC
 
Head coach speaks.
PAOLO DI CANIO, Wednesday 03 April, 2013
 
“I have clearly stated that I do not wish to speak about matters other than football, however, I have been deeply hurt by the attacks on the football club.
 
“This is a historic, proud and ethical club and to read and hear some of the vicious and personal accusations is painful. I am an honest man, my values and principles come from my family and my upbringing. 
 
"I feel that I should not have to continually justify myself to people who do not understand this, however I will say one thing only - I am not the man that some people like to portray.
 
“I am not political, I do not affiliate myself to any organisation, I am not a racist and I do not support the ideology of fascism. I respect everyone.
 
“I am a football man and this and my family are my focus.  Now I will speak only of football.” 
 
Please feel free to contact me.
 
Kind regards,
 
Lee Davies
Communication Systems Co-ordinator
Nelson Mandela Centre of Memory
at the Nelson Mandela Foundation
Tel: +27 11 547 5600
Fax: +27 11 728 1111

From: Ethel Arends
Sent: 05 April 2013 03:47 PM
To: Lee Davies
Subject: FW: Why did we march to free nelson mandela when you now stab us in the back?
From: MARK METCALF [mailto:markcmetcalf@btinternet.com]
Sent: 02 April 2013 08:12 PM
To: NMF
Subject: Why did we march to free nelson mandela when you now stab us in the back?
 
Dear Mandela Foundation,
 
As someone who marched, organised meetings and petitioned to have Nelson Mandela freed from prison can I express my disgust at your decision to retain your connection to the football club I have followed from over forty years.
 
Did Sunderland Football Club support the demands for Mandela's freedom, did Ellis Short, did Di Canio? No, it was ordinary people, like myself and you should hang your heads in deep shame by your actions which are a deep betrayal of the international struggle against racism and fascism.  
 
Mark Metcalf
Freelance journalist and author
West Yorkshire NUJ member
07952801783
 
 
 

Friday, 5 April 2013

Sunderland move towards fifth League title on this day 100 years ago



5th April 1913                                                                             League Division One

               SUNDERLAND   3                          WEST BROMWICH ALBION   1
    (Mordue Pen.25, Buchan 27, Tinsley 90)                      (Gregory 76)                     
                                                                                                
Referee: Mr. FH Dennis of Middlesbrough                                            Attendance 18,000

Sunderland: Butler, Gladwin, Ness, Cuggy, Low, Cringan, Mordue, Buchan, Richardson Tinsley, Martin
West Bromwich Albion: Moorwood, Smith, Cook, Waterhouse, Buck, McNeal, Jephcott, Gregory, Pailor, Bowser, Shearman

The victory that Sunderland gained over West Bromwich at Roker Park was well deserved though the margin of victory flattered them. Sunderland were without Thomson, Holley and Milton while Cook replaced Jessie Pennington (pictured left) for Albion. The weather was gloriously fine although a cold crosswind was blowing. This however did not affect the play that was watched by a crowd of about 18,000, which was more or less expected in view of Sunderland's popularity at the moment.

The game started quietly and it was some time before either team got into their stride. West Brom made the first attack but Sunderland were not long on replying. Cringan sent in a promising shot that swerved away as it neared goal while Richardson worked his way close in and would have scored had the ball not deflected off a defender. Sunderland were finding it difficult to get past Cook who was playing an exceptionally fine game and who checked the right wing repeatedly.

It was however largely due to Cook that Sunderland scored their 1st goal after 25 minutes. Buchan was running with the ball when Cook tripped him and conceded a penalty kick. Mordue took it and sent a rising shot into the net well out of Moorwood's reach. Hardly had the excitement subsided when 2 minutes later the home team scored another goal. This came after a smart piece of work by Martin had ran up the left wing and centred. The ball dropped just in front of goal and Buchan rushed in and headed into the net.

With a 2 goal lead Sunderland slackened off and they were forced onto the defensive for a time. Albion’s left wing was especially active and several shots came in with Bowyer shooting just over. Close to halftime Tinsley had a good chance from a centre by Cuggy but missed. West Bromwich were anything but a beaten team when the 2nd half started. Sunderland had stuck with a close passing game whereas Albion opened their play out and progressed with long sweeping passes. 

They were full of enterprise and made strenuous efforts to open their account. For some time Butler had only a Grayson shot to save though one from McNeil whizzed just over the bar. Richardson came close to scoring in the next Sunderland attack and got within 3 yards of goal before Moorwood dashed out and got the ball away. For a long spell after this West Bromwich did the bulk of the attacking but the home defence remained steady and cleared all the danger. Sunderland made attempts to relieve the pressure but could make little progress.

Albion were rewarded for their efforts 14 minutes from the end. They were attacking constantly when Shearman drove in a centre and Gregory raced forward to get clear and beat Butler. Encouraged by this success Albion played harder than ever and Sunderland had their work cut out to hold them. Butler made a great save from Bowser and Shearman shot wide after a scrimmage. Then Sunderland attacked with vigour and their efforts were fruitless until the last minute of the game. Whitehouse and Cook miskicked and Tinsley stepped in to secure the ball and score.

Sunderland were the better team and when they chose to exert themselves they made their superiority very clear. They were however inclined to take matters easy and after securing a 2 goal lead eased up. It was not until Albion scored and a draw seemed possible that they again got down to some serious work. The home defence was excellent. The halfbacks played a good game with Cuggy working hard. The right wing showed some of its usual brilliance but found Cook a big stumbling block and Richardson and Martin both did well.

West Bromwich gave a commendable performance though they were not brilliant. Shearman and Bowser were the better wing though Jephcott was often dangerous. Cook did much good work but marred his display by being responsible to some extent for 2 of Sunderlands goals. 


Home International Championship Match

England 1 v 0 Scotland
Stamford Bridge, London
5 April 1913

The 1913 British Home International championships was one of the most evenly contested on record. England topped the table at the end of the series of matches, courtesy of their 1 goal victory over Scotland but had succumbed to defeat earlier in the championship to Ireland. 

As far as Sunderland fans were concerned there were two of the clubs players on view, England’s George Holley and for Scotland Charlie Thomson. 

According to reports each teams half back stole the show; “two finer spoilers than the rival centre halves, Charles Thomson of Scotland and McCall of Preston North End, can scarcely ever have appeared in the same match”, said The Daily Mail. “Thomson to my mind was the best player on the field. He was always anticipating a movement and getting to the spot where it was to develop in time to stop it”. 

Thomson had taken over from Alex Raisbeck, the Liverpool centre half, in the Scotland team in 1909 but it was generally recognised that the Scots best player was Bobby Walker, a giant amongst Scottish footballers. The latter won his 28th cap for Scotland in this match so creating a British record. 

Bob Crompton was perhaps England’s finest player and as Captain he was well respected, winning his 25th cap in this game. 

England’s victory was far from convincing with the only goal of the game scored by Aston Villa’s Harry Hampton, “the Wellington Whirlwind” as he was known, who charged the goalkeeper over the line following a centre from Simpson. 

For once George Holley, Sunderland’s ace marksman, had a quiet game.

There was a late scare for England when Burnley’s Watson was injured and had to leave the field of play with 15 minutes of the match remaining reducing the home side to 10 men. 

England: Hardy (Aston Villa), Crompton (Blackburn Rovers), Pennington (West Bromwich Albion), Brittleton (Sheffield Wednesday), McCall (Preston North End), Watson (Burnley), Simpson (Blackburn Rovers), Fleming (Swindon Town), Hampton (Aston Villa), Holley (Sunderland), Hodkinson (Blackburn Rovers)

Scotland: Brownlie (Third Lanark), McNair (Glasgow Celtic), Walker J (Swindon Town), Gordon (Glasgow Rangers), Thomson (Sunderland), Wilson D (Oldham Athletic), Donnachie (Oldham Athletic), Walker (Heart of Midlothian), Reid (Glasgow Rangers), Wilson A (Sheffield Wednesday), Robertson (Sheffield Wednesday


Employees vulnerable as inspections cut


Employees vulnerable as inspections cut

From Big Issue in the North magazine

Safety campaigners fear Vincent Cable’s new policy to exempt many businesses from health and safety inspections will increase the number of employees being killed at work.

Last September Cable, the business secretary, said shops, offices and pubs would be excluded from inspections, claiming it would reduce business costs.

He has now followed this up with a statutory code that explicity outlaws proactive inspections by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) in all but ‘high risk areas.’

Sectors exempt 

This follows cuts in inspections in other sectors including what the government called low-risk manufacturing in 2011.

Cable said the changes are necessary because “removing unnecessary red tape and putting common sense back into health and safety will reduce fears and costs for businesses. This will give them the confidence to create more jobs and support the wider economy to grow.”

Hazards magazine, which describes itself as ‘independent, union-friendly,’ estimates there are now 37 sectors that are exempt from unannounced preventive HSE inspections. They include docks, bricks, road haulage, quarries and courier services. 

Farming is now classed as a “non-major hazard” industry where “proactive inspection is no longer considered a useful component of future inventions” even though agriculture is the most dangerous sector to work in. 

Despite comprising just 1.4% of the UK workforce it accounts for around a fifth of workplace deaths. Thirty people have so far been killed in Britain’s green fields in 2012-13.

A recent Stirling University study found that, if construction was excluded, that three-quarters of those killed from April 2011 to October 2012 were in sectors not subject to unannounced HSE inspections. 

Campaigner Hilda Palmer of the Greater Manchester Hazards Centre  said: “There are international studies showing businesses, communities and taxpayers all lose out if people are killed, injured or made ill by work. 

Injuries

“The Safe Work Australian policy setting government body reported last year that employers could get a £2bn boost to productivity by reducing injuries and illnesses. That would be the equivalent of a £6bn boost here.”

According to Safe Work Australia the boost to businesses would be dwarfed by gains to the injured that bear 74% of the costs with their local communities a further 21%.

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, the US agency charged with preventing work-related illnesses and injuries, last year calculated the annual direct and indirect costs to the US economy of occupational illnesses and injury to be $250bn. The Leigh study was the largest inquiry of its kind and excluded employer costs for staff turnover, retraining and hiring, and also diseases of the nervous system.

The HSE records the costs of workplace deaths, injuries and illnesses at £13.4 billion a year, excluding occupational cancer.

Hazards believes that the overall economic cost to the UK of workplace deaths, injuries at work, occupational cancers and asbestos deaths – which are currently averaging 4,000 a year - is close to £60bn.

“Cable’s strategy is short-sighted and guaranteed to increase businesses costs whilst failing to protect people from death, serious injury and workplace illnesses,” said Palmer. “It is immoral.”

Thursday, 4 April 2013

The Origins of the Football League - new book out in August

Due out at the start of next season. Anyone
football supporters' branches wanting a speaker on this
should get in touch on 07952801783.  

Tuesday, 2 April 2013

Letter to Nelson Mandela Foundation

  From: MARK METCALF <markcmetcalf@btinternet.com>
 To: "nmf@nelsonmandela.org" <nmf@nelsonmandela.org>
 Sent: Tuesday, 2 April 2013, 19:12
 Subject: Why did we march to free nelson mandela when you now stab us in the back?
 


Dear Mandela Foundation,

As someone who marched, organised meetings and petitioned to have Nelson Mandela freed from prison can I express my disgust at your decision to retain your connection to the football club I have followed for over forty years.

Did Sunderland Football Club support the demands for Mandela's freedom, did Ellis Short, did Di Canio? No, it was ordinary people, like myself and you should hang your heads in deep shame by your actions which are a deep betrayal of the international struggle against racism and fascism.

Mark Metcalf