Monday, 9 June 2025

30 years on - The Bradford riots

A film I have co-produced on the life of Mohammad Taj is due out shortly. In 2001 he was brave enough to interrupt a riot in Manningham to rescue a bus with passengers stuck in the middle of it. The riot followed an earlier one in Bradford that kicked off on 9 June 1995 and which he later analysed and proposed solutions to that were ignored by the Government. 

TAKEN FROM MOHAMMAD TAJ: STEERING FROM THE FRONT

Published 2018 by UNITE the union, free to download at:- https://markwrite.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/6328dpmt2018-taj-booklet-web.pdf

 

Standing up for what he believed in: the 1995 Bradford riots

Bradford hit the national news when over the weekend of Friday 9 June to Sunday 11 June 1995 public disorder occurred in the Manningham District, where many Asian people live, before spreading to Bradford City Centre.

Central to the disorders were young Asian men, a generation scarred by racism, restricted job opportunities and police harassment.

The trouble started at around 9.25pm on 9 June after two police officers, angered at being abused, arrested two young Asian men. In the ensuing chaos, requests from several residents about why the youths were being arrested were ignored and were met with the arrival of several more police vehicles and officers at the scene.

Events spiralled out of control when more arrests were made and a police dog handler roughly instructed a respected elderly resident to go indoors and threatened the man with his dog in an area where the predominant culture regarded such an animal as unclean. Many in the local community viewed the police actions as examples of racism, intolerance and ignorance.

Consequently when further arrests were made of local people, the vast majority of whom had previously never been in trouble with the police and were mounting peaceful protests demanding the release of those arrested earlier, the situation descended into rioting as bottles were thrown at police officers.

On Saturday 10 June 1995 there was at one point around a thousand mainly young Asian men battling with around 600 police officers in riot gear.

 A debate on the disorder was secured in Parliament by Max Madden, the MP for Bradford West, on 21 June 1995, at the conclusion of which Nicholas Baker, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for the Home 33 Office Department, rejected calls for a wide-ranging public inquiry, saying: “The Government are satisfied that the Inquiry by the Police Complaints Authority (PCA) will investigate all the circumstances surrounding the complaints against the police over that weekend.”

Seventeen months after the Bradford riots in 1995, Mohammad Taj criticised police for learning nothing.

When the Inquiry was completed in April 1996 the PCA concluded that: “Allegations of police misconduct and assault in particular were of major concern to the public. The investigation had, however, found the allegations (with one exception) to have been entirely without foundation.” The Crown Prosecution Service decided that no criminal charges should be brought against any police officer.

The decision by the Government to reject a wide-ranging public inquiry led to the Bradford Congress, a voluntary association of representative Bradford institutions including the City Council, agreeing to appoint its own Commission of Inquiry.

The terms of reference were: “to conduct hearings to consider the wider implications for Bradford of recent events in a part of the inner city of Bradford, in order to help to create a better future for all people of the district and to promote peace, harmony and understanding between the communities of Bradford.”

Hearings began in October 1995. Bradford Congress appointed sociology professor Sheila Allen, consultant John Barratt, a solicitor with experience in investigations into local authorities and who became chairman of the inquiry and Mohammad Taj as its Commission members.

Following the bruising battle over the sale of Yorkshire Rider, Taj was given time away from work by his management. “I think they were glad to not see me at work for a while. When I was approached to be involved I made clear I would only do so if the final report would include recommendations that I felt would be bound to include requests for public funds. I felt I was given this guarantee.”

The Commission read an immense number of books, research papers and official documents. 76 members of the public were interviewed and 189 attended lengthy small group meetings to put forward their individual views. 119 officials and public representatives assisted the Commission, which recorded that 45 per cent of young men in the local Asian communities of Manningham were unemployed.

When the Commission issued its report on 20 November 1996 it was very critical of the actions of the police on 9-11 June 1995.

According to Taj when he spoke to police officers during the Inquiry he was “shocked to find out that their anti-racist training was literally done in a day and involved a visit to a Muslim ‘Temple’ not Mosque! The officers had no understanding of the people they were policing.” The Commission commented on long-term problems between the police and local Kashmiri youths who were regularly forced to endure “inappropriate, unfair, or racist treatment by individual officers.”

The Commission ended its report quoting US President Johnson’s 1968 statement on civil disorders in his country: “the only genuine, long-range solution for what has happened lies in an attack upon the conditions that breed despair and violence. All of us know what those conditions are: ignorance, discrimination, slums, poverty, disease, not enough jobs.” However, the Commission’s Report did not outline any practical tasks – or attacks in Johnson’s words.

On 25 November 1996, Max Madden tabled a motion in Parliament which noted the ‘lack of specific recommendations for action, especially by Central Government to help people living in the Manningham and Girlington areas of Bradford overcome acute poverty and deprivation...(such as) increasing Local Government funding to enable Bradford City Council to maintain key services.....to increase numbers of police officers on duty, to expand the recruitment of ethnic minority police officers and training programmes to combat endemic racism within the police service.”

Taj refused to sign off the report because it was vague and made no positive recommendations. Instead he issued his own 25-page report: A CAN DO CITY. Bob Purkiss, the first TGWU National Equalities Officer for race equality, praised this as “excellent…. much of the report is also relevant to many other parts of our society.”

Taj was widely reported in local and national newspapers. He felt that too much of “the City’s institutions can’t do culture” had damaged the report such that “When challenged to admit that there are racists within their ranks the Police Service ‘can’t do’ that for fear of undermining public confidence” and “When challenged to deal with the extensive discrimination existing in the field of employment the private sector ‘can’t do’ anything because of the exigencies and pressures of commercial life.

“When challenged to condemn the repressive and extremist forces at work within their own communities Asians ‘can’t do’ that because they would be seen as comforting bigots. The ‘can’t do’ culture is at is most pervasive and extreme within the Local Authority. Over twenty years of reducing real budgets, an unsympathetic central government and media ready to pounce on any misjudgment by a Council have habituated the authority to inaction. It has a culture that is far more ready and practiced at explaining why it can’t do anything rather than devising a way of getting something done.”

On police racism as an exacerbating factor to the riots, Taj stated: “I want them to openly acknowledge that there are racists in their ranks and kick them out in short order”.

He felt that: “For the Asian communities, and here I mean the largely Muslim communities, I have challenged them to start addressing their own failings.” The Daily Jang, an Urdu newspaper based in Karachi, Pakistan reported that significant amongst these criticisms by Taj of his own community was an attitude that integration would mean a loss of religion and culture and the subordinate role allocated to Muslim women.

Additionally, Taj said: “There are real failings and I have not been afraid to speak out about them. Koranic education can be a powerful force for the good. However, this will not occur if Arabic rote teaching is not accompanied by guidance in an accessible language.”

Because so many children from the Asian community were entering school with inadequate language skills, for which Taj contended most did not recover, he argued “there is an urgent need for a truly vast increase in new buildings – the construction of which would boost jobs and the local economy – for nursery education if the school system is to stop turning out ill-educated, disenchanted and disruptive young ‘Asians’. This is a massive task to undertake but huge problems are not resolved by meagre solutions.”

Taj’s other suggestions were for a councillor-led Manningham Development Executive, and a clamp-down on drugs trafficking, particularly in the Manningham area.

Taj felt: “The Local Authority must also look to central Government for co-operation. It is entirely reasonable to request additional assistance from this source when pursuing innovative, radical and cost-effective solutions to deepening difficulties.”

Speaking in 2017, Taj explains. “As we got nearer to completion there was pressure from the major institutions not to make financial demands on national Government or even on Local Government, as in the latter case it would mean diverting resources from the outer areas of Bradford towards the inner city. Neither was politically acceptable and I argued that the Girlington Report, where most residents are of South Asian origin, from 6-7 years previously had already identified the issues in inner cities.”

According to Jowett: “Taj was under tremendous pressure by the Bradford political establishment to sign the official report. I know they approached him just before the report was due to be officially signed by its three commission members with a job offer to him to become the co ordinator of a new community relations body they hoped to establish in Manningham.

 Taj had been critical of many 1970s black radicals, including those in the AYM, from inner-city areas who were co-opted by local authorities and then became of no use to the communities they came from. He did not want to tread the same path.  “Taj, who I know always liked being a bus driver, stood by what he believed and I think that may have later counted against him when he sought selection as the Labour candidate in Bradford West shortly afterwards. Generally, Taj believes in having arguments internally within any organisation and if he loses he will go out and support the policy or person. But there comes a time on certain issues when the gap is too big and you have to stand your ground no matter the consequences. This was one such occasion.”

 “I disagreed with him over his decision not to put his name to the report as I felt he was setting himself up to fail but if Taj feels strongly enough about something he will stand his ground,” states Gerry Sutcliffe.

The authorities unwillingness to take up Taj’s demands meant that in 2001 there was a much more violent riot in Manningham. Right in the middle of the mayhem a bus got stuck with passengers and its driver on it. “Taj actually went to the bus and assisted with it leaving the scene without harm. It was a very brave thing to do,” says Jowett.


Friday, 23 May 2025

WORLD DAY AGAINST CHILD LABOUR ON 12 JUNE EVENT IN WAINSTALLS, HALIFAX

 

THURSDAY 12th JUNE
WORLD DAY AGAINST CHILD LABOUR
4.30pm at Luddenden Dean Wesleyan Methodist Chapelyard
Heys Lane, HX2 7TR England
Wreath laying for 7 worked to death orphans buried in the cemetery
Speakers to include 17-year-old Charlie Metcalf and Dan Whittall (NEU).
There are 160 million children working worldwide of which 112 million are working on small farms on plantations, often in hazardous conditions. Few of the youngsters have access to trade union protection and in recent years, progress on eliminating child labour has slowed and at the heart of which is the poverty wages being earned by parent’s such that they cannot afford to cover the basic needs of their children, including food and education.
However, in every continent, and in businesses of every size, trafficked children working in cocoa plantations have gone to court to hold big companies to account – Cargill, Mondelez, Barry Callebaut, Mars plus Nestle, whose cocoa supply chain leads from West Africa to their headquarters at the other end of Lake Geneva.
The youngest a child can work part time in the UK is aged 13. That has not always been the case (1) and buried in a mass grave at Luddenden Dean Wesleyan Methodist Chapelyard are seven female children and young women from a Liverpool workhouse who worked for Calverts, a local mill, in the nineteenth century. They were amongst 250 young girls forced to move across the Pennines in the late 19th century to settle outside Halifax in Luddenden Valley, which is beautiful on its relatively few sunny days but bleak in the autumn and winter when the winds get up and snow falls. (2)
Thanks to the efforts of trade unions and child welfare campaigners we have labour laws that now, on paper, protect children. Nevertheless in 2023-24, 2 young children were killed whilst engaging in work activities on farms whilst Cameron Minshull, aged 16, was killed in 2015 in a horrific lathe accident on a Government-funded apprenticeship where he was being paid £3 an hour. His factory boss was jailed.
It is vital to keep up the pressure to protect children and to this end CTUC is organising a wreath lay ceremony at the Chapelyard at 4.30pm on Thursday June 12th, which is the WORLD DAY AGAINST CHILD LABOUR. This is organised by the International Labour Organisation with the backing of UNICEF. 

Everyone is welcome to attend this important event. Bring flowers to lay at the graveside.

1.       Watch ‘Not So Happy Valley’ by Mark Metcalf https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YdcrdIlxs60&t=107s
For more details contact Nigel on 07709 684473 or Mark on 07392 852561

Calderdale TU Council, c/o Calderdale NEU, Elsie Whitley Innovation Centre, Halifax HX1 5ER 

Friday, 9 May 2025

200 years on, let’s not forget them - North Sands Massacre, Sunderland, 3 August, 1825

 

200 years on, let’s not forget them

North Sands Massacre, Sunderland, 3 August, 1825

Nearly 200 years ago, on 3rd August 1825, at least five people were shot dead by soldiers at North Sands, Sunderland. 

The massacre occurred during a strike by the Seamen's Loyal Standard Association (S.L.S.A.), an embryonic trade union.  The context was lowering wages, attempts by local shipowners to smash the association through the Ship Owners Protecting Society [S.O.P.S.], and a controversial legal case between the S.L.S.A and John Davidson, a local shipowner and magistrate, who’d failed to pay workers for fitting out his ship.  Specifically, the 1825 strike was about offloading ballast at sea from unladen boats returning to the port.  The S.L.S.A argued this was both dangerous, as the ships could capsize, and unfair because crews were not paid additional wages for this work.

During the strike, members of the S.L.S.A. prevented ships from leaving port.  On the day before the massacre, 2nd August 1825, attempts to negotiate a settlement collapsed.  The S.L.S.A. had proposed the strike would end if the shipowners promised to provide work opportunities for union men and pay for offloading ballast at land or sea. S.O.P.S. rejected this proposal, so striking seamen returned to the river on their small coble boats to prevent larger ships from sailing.

On the 3rd August, the ship owners decided it was time to break the strike.  Several shipowners, non-unionised labour and special constables attempted to get several ships out to sea.  Initially frustrated, they turned to John Davidson, a Bishop Wearmouth magistrate.  Davidson was antagonistic to the S.L.S.A. following the outcome of the above-mentioned legal case, where he had lost £200 (approx. £24,000 equivalent today) in legal fees.  At Sunderland harbour, Davidson boarded a steam packet. At least eight soldiers from the 3rd Light Dragoons, under command of Lieutenant Phillips, also sailed down the river in the Thomas and Dorothy before joining Davidson on the steam packet.

Striking seamen on the river retreated to the stony beach at North Sands. More than 100 people, including women and children, had gathered there by that time.  As the steam packet ventured closer to the riverbank, some women in the crowd started throwing stones.  Davidson consulted with Lieutenant Phillips, and the soldiers opened fire. According to a S.L.S.A letter dated 8th August 1825; soldiers fired into the crowd as if it were targeting practice.  Three died within an hour on the beach, and at least two others died within the next two days.  Six were seriously wounded, and the exact number of deaths may never be known.  Local people demanded an inquest verdict of murder for the dead, named as William Ayrd, Richard Wallace, John Dove[r], Ralph Hunter Creighton, and James Quigley, of whom the latter two, Creighton and Quigley, were bystanders. But the inquests returned verdicts of ‘justifiable homicide’ for the first three deaths and ‘accidental death’ for Creighton.   

The funeral procession comprised 1,200 people.  Mourners sang, wore black crape and solemnly placed a British flag on the coffins.  Criminal court cases followed in October 1825, and eight strikers were imprisoned.  Further seamen strikes occurred in 1826 and 1831, but neither had such a bloody ending.

To mark the 200th anniversary of the North Sands massacre, on Sunday, 3rd August 2025, a remembrance procession will take place at 2.15pm from St Peter's Church, Sunderland. A commemorative wreath in remembrance of the dead will be placed at the location of the North Sands massacre (now St Peter’s Campus, University of Sunderland). There will be readings, singing, and the naming of the dead.  All are welcome.  Please bring your Union banners. 

Dave Allan, Sunderland TUC President, Mark Metcalf and David Scott  Further details can be obtained from David on 07838245382 or Mark on 07392 852561

Wednesday, 7 May 2025

FORGING LINKS, CHANGING LIVES - How unions like Unite make the world’s workplaces better

 

FORGING LINKS, CHANGING LIVES

UniteLANDWORKER Winter 2024

How unions like Unite make the world’s workplaces better

 

Workers of the world, UNITE!


Over the last forty years particularly, the worldwide expansion of markets across all sectors has taken a heavy toll on workers and trade unions. Labour’s relationship with political parties has also weakened.

So, it’s more vital than ever that trade unionists across the world build alliances with one another that protect and advance their terms, conditions and rights.

Thankfully, Unite, and its descendant unions before it, fully understands the need for international solidarity and is part of a number of organisations dedicated to building internationalism.

One such body is the IUF, the food, farm, hotels, restaurants and fast-food chains global union representing 12 million workers that was formed in 1920 but dates back to 1889.

Unite’s Bev Clarkson is the President of the IUF Agricultural Workers Trade Group and in this interview, she explains her role and the crucial work of the IUF.

“I lead efforts to represent agricultural workers concerns at international forums within the IUF. This includes addressing issues like fair wages, working conditions, safety and labour rights across the agricultural sector.”

Agricultural work is, even in Britain, a highly dangerous occupation whilst death rates in the USA are seven times the national average.

“This involves working with unions globally to tackle shared challenges such as, seasonal labour, exploitation and climate change.”

Bev works closely with the Unite FDA executive council (EC) delegates along with the National Industrial Sector Committee (NISC) members on all these policies with Unite having delegates holding various seats within the IUF.

According to Bev it is important that Unite takes a leading role in the IUF because it “represents workers worldwide across food and agriculture sectors heavily represented by Unite. Actively participating helps Unite build a unified front to address challenges that are often shared across borders.”




Success

The shared challenges include workers in food, drink and agriculture being vulnerable to working conditions, low wages and, in some cases, exploitation in the global supply chain. One such case where Unite worked with trade union affiliates within the IUF to put an end to abhorrent sexual abuse on Kenyan tea farms was featured in the 2024 Landworker Summer edition. This followed a Panorama programme in 2023.

International trade agreements can also influence labour standards, wage levels and job security whilst policies on food safety, animal welfare, and agricultural practices affect the whole of the sector.

“Agriculture is also particularly vulnerable to the effects of climate change, with rising temperatures and unpredictable weather conditions more frequent, “ states Bev.

“Extreme weather patterns threaten yields and crops.  Unite members in agriculture are directly affected, extreme weather can lead to income instability and job insecurity.”

This was something that was highlighted in the 2024 Summer Landworker in articles on rain, the heaviest over the previous 18 months since records began, and heat with the UK recording the hottest day ever in 2022. Similar weather patterns can be found worldwide –leading to scores of Californian farmworkers dying - and clearly need to be tackled internationally if the world is not to face a catastrophic scenario.

Strengthening global rights

Bev hopes to see the IUF achieve many things over the next few years including strengthening global labour rights, improving wages and reducing wage inequality, enhancing health and safety standards, promoting job security, dealing with exploitation in the workplace and supply chain, strengthening union solidarity and concluding global policies for gender equality and anti-discrimination.

Migrant workers in the UK play a major role in food production. Many arrive having never previously been in a trade union. “They are vulnerable to exploitation more so within the agriculture sector where many workplaces are remote with the whole of the workforce also being migrant workers. They face issues such as underpayments, excessive hours, unsafe working conditions and poor housing.

“Clearly without union support, workers lack an organised way to address grievances, negotiate wages and secure any working benefits. The work migrants often do is of a precarious nature such as zero hours and seasonal work and this in its self can be very challenging.”

Thanks to Unite, migrant workers are getting active within the IUF

“In many places we have been successful in organising migrant workers in particular within the meat sector, our reps within the sector are now delegates not only in the UK but also within the IUF,” states Bev proudly.

Worldwide, the majority of child labour, affecting 112 million boys and girls, often in countries with high poverty levels and little access to education, is found in agriculture including  farming, fishing, coca and sugar cane production to name just a few.

Bev identifies Africa and South Asia as having the highest rate of child labour in agriculture, “although developed countries also see cases especially across migrant labour communities. This is invisible labour due to informal working arrangements and lack of regulation in rural areas. “

She identifies how the global demand for cheap inexpensive food encourages the use of cheap child labour.

“This starts at the top with the food retailers pushing down the prices throughout the supply chain. To end child poverty, we need to end adult poverty and to do this we need to stop the exploitation of workers in the sector brought about by the global supermarkets.”

Can members who don’t work in the food, farm, hotels, restaurants and fast-food sectors back the efforts of the IUF?

“Yes,” she replies. “They can actively take part in joint campaigns organised by the IUF, support global days of action, lobby for ethical standards, putting pressure on multinationals that often have head offices in the UK to adopt collective bargaining rights across the whole supply chain.”

https://www.iuf.org

Joint campaigns currently include

Safe Workplaces for Fast Food Workers

https://www.iuf.org/safe-workplaces-for-fast-food-workers-now/

Growing Justice – Workers Fight for Good Jobs on Fyffes Farms

https://www.iuf.org/campaigns/fyffes/

Marriott Worldwide Workers Together

https://www.workersofmarriott.org

Coca-Cola’s Human Rights Violations

https://www.iuf.org/campaigns/coca-cola-campaign/

 

GROUNDS FOR CHANGE Top quality soil is vital for the UK’s food future, says Unite expert

 

GROUNDS FOR CHANGE

Top quality soil is vital for the UK’s food future, says Unite expert

UniteLANDWORKER WINTER 2024



As someone who sees himself as a shop steward for the land, Charlie Clutterbuck, Unite’s own soil scientist, would like Britain to mirror recent EU developments by introducing a sustainable soil directive.

Healthy soils form the base for 95% of our food, host a quarter of the world’s biodiversity and are the planet’s largest carbon pool. So, with soil being a limited resource that is often in poor condition then securing its long-term health is vital for all our futures.

When the EU 2007 Soil Framework Directive collapsed under pressure from the NFU and a Labour Government in hoc to major building companies not willing to rectify contaminated land, Britain having lots of it from our industrialised past, then it cut hopes of a soil policy that carried some weight.

Opposition continued. When the Lords passed a proposal by former Labour Environment Minister Lord Whitty for an amendment to the Tories’ Environment Bill to add ‘soil targets’ to water and air targets, the Johnson government subsequently rejected this by promising a Soil Health Action Plan instead.

“That has been quietly dropped down the drain along with around 2 million tons annually of our best grade 1 and 2 arable land in the East, “ explains Charlie, “and as we can’t grow it back then it means we will increasingly rely on imports going forward.”

Much of the EU faces similar problems and has now sought to defend its soils by introducing a soil monitoring law that aims to bring about a comprehensive monitoring framework for an assessment of soil health whilst developing sustainable soil management practices. The general approach is to be centred on tackling soil sealing and soil destruction whilst member states will be required to identify all potentially contaminated sites, before mapping them in a public register.

Charlie believes “we should proceed down a similar path. It won’t be easy because whilst there is a bit of Single Farming Initiative money to individual UK farmers to encourage healthier soil the application is complex and the results difficult to determine.”

Under the EU proposed directive plans the ultimate aspirational objective is to have all soils in a healthy condition by 2050, in line with the EU Zero Pollution ambition.

“We should study the EU plans and seek to follow them,” contends Charlie who is concerned that the UK has no similar targets or plan and no overall research direction or body responsible.

“The soil is our very thin skin of the earth which could be doing so much more to grow crops here in ways that can reduce climate change impacts through carbon storage, reduced surface temperatures and water holding.”

Rural buses backed in major report - Unite drivers provide essential lifelines

 

Rural buses backed in major report

Unite drivers provide essential lifelines


uniteLANDWORKER Winter 2024 

For the big accountancy company KPMG to back investment in public services then it is an indication of how important local buses are to communities across the UK, especially in rural areas.

Their latest report “The Economic Impact of Local Bus Services” on behalf of the Confederation of Passenger Transport (CPT) makes just a case. All of which should prompt transport secretary Louise Haigh (*) and local authorities to expand bus services, especially in underserved rural regions where public transport remains a lifeline.

The report highlights how every £1 invested in bus priority measures achieves £5 in economic benefits.

Rural bus passengers meanwhile generate £7.1 billion in local economies through spending on retail, leisure, and commuting services. Services also support employment and education, are crucial in reducing social isolation, promote volunteering and provide health access.

Unite bus workers working across rural communities understand how important their services are.

Cath Mawson is the Unite branch secretary for Yorkshire Coastliner, part of the global group Transdev, which operates local and regional bus services in North and West Yorkshire including travels between Leeds and the Yorkshire coastal towns of Scarborough and Whitby taking villages along the way.

The 840 route runs from Leeds to Whitby and serves many small villages including Goathland, well known for being the location for Heartbeat.

Travellers gaze out on fields, streams, windmills, farmhouses, horses, ducks, geese, sheep and cattle as well as caravan parks and small-scale housing. It is beautiful, especially on a sunny, slight chilly day. One stop is just a quarter of mile from Flamingo Land.

“We carry a variety of travellers, enabling journeys to work & college. With the introduction of the £2 fare(*) , passengers travel further for work,” says Cath.

This is confirmed by Melanie, aged 17, and Joe Bentley, who both make the 86-minute journey from Pickering to York to study hairdressing at college and psychology at university respectively. Neither can yet drive.

“There is a college bus but on days when I don’t need to be there early I can take the public bus at just £2,” states Melanie.


Bentley adds: “It is very affordable, at £2 a trip.  I currently attend university on 3 days a week. When I finish I hope to do a job that helps people.”

Cath continues: “Our Coastliner route exceeds three hours passing through many rural villages, supporting tourism. We are a lifeline for people lacking their own transport.

“We may have relatively few passengers, but they rely on us to do their shopping and attend medical appointments because we are the only affordable way to travel. “

Cathy, a former teacher, has been a Unite steward for three years. as says she welcomes the “opportunity to help and support members and to get their voice heard with management.”

Cath is also involved in wage negotiations which have this year raised pay to £15.73 an hour with rates set to rise to £16.28 in 2025.

We met Brenda Lees who is an 840-bus regular. “I am hoping that my dentist check-up will show I don’t need any treatment.”

And Laura, who is prevented from driving due to a rare syndrome, moved to her parents’ house in Thornton Le Dale 30 years ago for “a few months but stayed because it is beautiful and public transport is good”

Coming back from the Co-op in Pickering, she adds: “Shopping there is affordable, but only because I can use the bus rather than having to pay for a taxi.”

Two years ago, the Malton-Whitby part of the 840 route was under threat of being withdrawn in April 2023. A local campaign was immediately and collected over 1,300 signatures in a few days.

BBC Look North news interviewed Cathy Morgan, was part of the fight to save the service. She was left with epilepsy as a result of a stroke. “Like my other elderly neighbours, I rely on the bus, which today I am using to make part of a journey to York, getting off the bus at Malton and getting the train as it is quicker, to make sure I am on time for an important appointment. I also use the buses for social activity like trips to the coast.

“We are fortunate to have the buses and the drivers are also warm and welcoming,” explains Cathy, who was delighted when the campaign stopped any reduction in the 840 service.

According to Cath, “for the older generation especially, social interaction is often an important part of their journey. They see regular drivers as a friendly face who they can have a chat with.

“This interaction is vital for people who may live alone in quite isolated places. The ability to leave the house and interact with others is a massive positive for mental health.”

To enhance these services the CPT report advocates targeted investment in rural buses.

Cath agrees. “Rural bus journeys always risk being cut on cost effective grounds. But their value goes way beyond the financial by allowing people freedom to participate in everyday life.

That includes passengers such as Christopher Heriot, who uses “the bus a lot for days out to Scarborough and York to have some fun and to catch the sea and sunshine.”

 

Says Cath: “Support is imperative to ensure bus operators continue to operate. Bus drivers see the positive impact our service makes with people living in these villages and it is a privilege to know we are making a difference to their daily lives.” 

The Rural Services Network have backed the report’s conclusions with Chief Executive Kerry Booth stating “we must ensure rural communities are not left behind. Investing in better bus services is critical to unlocking rural prosperity and helping rural communities.”

(*) Information correct at time of interview