tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9213221449000331725.post94786228741558847..comments2024-03-18T16:37:37.520-07:00Comments on Fighting Talk by Mark Metcalf : Michael Stone is innocentMarkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06716887628697814090noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9213221449000331725.post-20176686135932202302017-11-30T12:55:15.900-08:002017-11-30T12:55:15.900-08:00Get https://twitter.com/ZellnerLaw on the case ......Get https://twitter.com/ZellnerLaw on the case ... Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9213221449000331725.post-82811002755594762582013-01-17T15:27:10.771-08:002013-01-17T15:27:10.771-08:00I have written volumes in an effort to prove that ...I have written volumes in an effort to prove that Michael Stone is innocent and I have now condensed it down to an extremely concise logical passage:-<br /><br /><br />The only witness to the event, the daughter has clearly stated that it was not Michael Stone who confronted the family, implication by her failure to point him out in an identity parade. If you argue that her memory was impaired by the assault then you have to rule out her evidence that suggested that the motive was robbery.<br /><br /><br />Required result: Stone gets released, the police re-open the enquiry.<br /><br /><br />Statistical analysis and simple profiling would suggest that the guilty party in the murder of Marsha Mcdonnel and Amelia Delagrange also did the Chilenden murder.<br /><br /><br />Levi Bellfield is investigated.<br /><br /><br />If Levi Bellfield is found to be guilty of the Chilenden murder, then it has to be admitted that the murder of Russel family was pre-meditated in order to make it appear like the motive was theft, because it could not be argued that this was Bellfields motive.<br /><br /><br />If the above is true then it is not unfair to assume that there is a possibility that the next murder that the law has proven him guilty of, was also pre-meditated in order to frame another innocent man by virtue of the fact that the MO of the Milly Dowler murder with the motive being made to appear sexual. Surrey police are known to have approached a man five years after with the intent of charging him if he failed to remember where he was at the time that Milly got snatched. That man has documentary proof that Surrey police have falsified dates on the transcripts of statements made by the suspect in order to cover up a huge gap between their receiving the extremely suspect lead that they claim lead them to him.<br /><br /><br />If the above is true then there had to be a hidden driving force behind the killings<br /><br />.<br />Who gets the job of investigating this one?<br /><br /><br />If he is found to be not guilty of the Chilenden murder then the real killer is still at large.<br /><br /><br />If he is not guilty of the Chilenden murders then by the previously applied logic he is not guilty of the other hammer murders. Is he, in fact, guilty of the murder of Milly Dowler?There appears to be no evidence to that effect. It seems that he was found guilty by virtue of a reputation that preceded him, that we now know to be false. He remained silent which rather than prove that he is guilty much more strongly suggests that he is simply staying quiet to protect someone else. <br /><br /><br />This logic ends with the question, who is the real killer and why are the police protecting him? Was it in fact Jimmy Savile?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08213280732039270555noreply@blogger.com