It is 56 minutes long and went out on Tuesday 7 December 2021.
https://play.acast.com/s/achtung-radio/the-football-history-podcast-4-fred-spiksley?s=09
It followed an earlier podcast by myself on Charlie Hurley by Achtung Millwall.
It is 56 minutes long and went out on Tuesday 7 December 2021.
https://play.acast.com/s/achtung-radio/the-football-history-podcast-4-fred-spiksley?s=09
It followed an earlier podcast by myself on Charlie Hurley by Achtung Millwall.
Riding project helps teach vital life skills
Horses expensively trained to remain calm
A Bradford horse riding programme for disengaged school children has drawn praise from participants and their parents.
Changing Lives Through Horses (CL) is a national project
organised by the British Horse Society (BHS) that takes place with qualified coaches
at approved riding centres including the Throstle Nest Riding school at Wilsden
Equestrian Centre.
Opportunities extended
The BHS project is aimed at young people who are
“permanently excluded, at risk of permanent exclusion or who have special education
needs or disabilities”, those who are not in employment, education, or
training, or lack the skills to improve their economic situation.
Throstle Nest is run by Jeanette Wilder, who has been
working with horses since she was 12 when, along with her brother, she used
ponies from the family dairy farm to teach riding skills to children from the
Eccleshill area in Bradford. Wilder’s passion for horses has been extended into
providing opportunities for young people who are otherwise very unlikely to learn
to ride the animals.
“We put something back into the community. The Riding for
the Disabled Association (RDA) is linked to us. When the BHS established
Changing Lives four years ago, I immediately got us involved. Whilst it brings
in some income, we lose out by needing to turn away other customers,” said
Wilder
A general lesson at Wilsden costs £20 for 30 minutes and £25
for 45 minutes. On the Changing Lives programme the fees are £28 an hour and
£45 for two. The costs are covered by schools, the RDA, parents and charitable
associations.
Prodding and poking
Amelia Helm, aged 14, has been riding for ten years. She
persuaded her school to let her begin attending CL sessions in September.
“I am struggling speaking in school lessons,” she said.
“Coming here is relaxing. It is fun and I have no worries as I don’t need to
make an effort for people. “I do the lessons with other age groups and I relate
to them as we are all passionate about horses.”
She also attends weekend pony club lessons and enjoys mucking
out the stables and looking after the horses. She wants to do work experience
at the riding school next year as she is looking to work with horses when she
leaves education.
In addition to support from volunteers, Throstle Nest
employs eight full-time staff, all women
On site it has 21
horses, more expensive to buy in recent years. Horses must be four years old
and fullytrained before they can be used in the riding school and the animals,
which need to be calm and forgiving enough to be able to overcome some prodding
and poking, must be five before they can be employed on RDA sessions. To save
costs, Wilder bought a three-year-old horse, which staff are training. There is
no guarantee the horse will prove suitable for lessons.
There were nine children of varying abilities aged seven to
15 years on a Tuesday CL session in November. “We don’t tend to look at their
diagnosis but just work with them on a weekly basis as the children can be
totally different on each occasion,” said Wilder. “Sometimes they can be having
a bad day because of a change of medication. We have a plan but you can realise
it won’t work. You must be patient but we have a much lower ratio of staff
compared to pupils than at school and so we can make swift changes.”
Special relationship
Warren Keighley, aged six, who has complex needs, has been
attending the CL programme for two years.
“A physiotherapist identified that working with horses would
be very beneficial for building his core strength,” said his mum Hannah. “The
facilities here and the whole environment and dedication of staff, who are
empathetic with children that have different needs, means you feel included.”
Grandad Martin is also a big fan. “Warren has moved from
being afraid to get on a horse to saddling it up, mounting, leading and
dismounting from the animal,” he said.
During lockdown the centre trained parents and grandparents
in how to lead horses and this helped facilitate lessons for Warren.
Before lockdown,
Warren had built a special relationship with staff member Evie. On the day Big
Issue North visited, the pair had met for the first time in over a year.
A smiling Warren said: “What I liked about today is when I
saw Evie and I cried as I was happy. Missy was my horse today. She is a bit
cheeky like another horse called Dolly. I like coming here and being in charge
of a horse.”
According to Wilder the racing industry is offering
opportunities to young people to undertake apprenticeships in stable yards and
the pay thereafter is good.
Wilder explained that children attending the CL project are
taught to work with others and to pay attention and concentrate as otherwise
they get into trouble with the horse.
“It also improves their balance and by being fun it helps
develop an interest that we can channel into education generally,” she said.
“If they switch off at school in English and mathematics then we can get them
to write about horses and work out how much to feed the animals.”
In more basic scenarios, children get to recognise different
colours when they pick up objects when riding a horse.
The CL programme uses a range of awards that “are structured
around promoting the holistic development of all involved and nurturing six
life skills for all young people: building relationships, communication,
confidence, responsibility, teamwork and perseverance”.
Susan*, who has seen her two sons benefit from engaging with
horses said: “My eldest, who is hypermobile and has been diagnosed with
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, has improved his core strength by
coming here.
“He has completed the award scheme development and
accreditation network qualification, which took him a year. He is not going to
achieve a standard qualification, so having a certificate where he can say
‘Look, I can do this’ is great for self-confidence.”
Susan’s youngest son
is nine. His CL programme is funded by his school and the RDA.
She said: “It has created a connection with horses, which
has helped him emotionally and his attention span has expanded. When riding he
must consider the needs of the horse and this moves him away from thinking
about himself and helps him to get on with other children.”
Susan believes that many more disengaged children would have
their lives improved if there were more opportunities to attend the project.
MARK METCALF * Name changed
SOIL
INCENTIVE PITFALLS
Farmers
to be paid for sustainable practices
Critics
say soil quality is difficult to measure
Article from Big Issue North magazine
Agricultural
experts who believe soil quality is critical for the UK’s food supply have
welcomed the government’s decision to pay farmers to improve it for the first
time. But concerns remain over how soil quality will be assessed and the
mechanism for paying farmers.
Following
Brexit, Britain is phasing out the European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy
farm subsidies and replacing them with the Sustainable Farming Incentive (SFI)
scheme, to be introduced next year.
According to
the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), the SFI is
“centred around incentivising sustainable farming practices alongside profitable
food production and rewarding farmers for producing public goods such as better
air and water quality, protecting wildlife and improving soil health”.
Compaction
and erosion
The plans
are part of the government’s 25-year Environment Plan, which includes a net
zero carbon ambition.
Soil quality
and biodiversity supports agricultural production and the storage of carbon.
But almost 4 million hectares of soil in England and Wales are at risk of
compaction, according to the Environment Agency, and 2 million hectares are at
risk of erosion.
Intensive
agriculture has caused arable soils to lose 40-60 per cent of their organic
carbon, said the Environment Agency in July. But it added that there is
insufficient data on soil health and called for investment in monitoring.
From next
year, farmers can sign up to SFI schemes to improve arable and horticultural
soils at payments between £30 and £59 per hectare and grassland soils at £6-£8
per hectare. According to a Defra spokesperson: “Healthy soil is key to
supporting our targets on the environment and improving farm profitability.
Well managed soils can lead to increased biodiversity, increased carbon
sequestration and storage, improved water quality and flood prevention.”
Food
scientist Charlie Clutterbuck, an academic and author who holds a PhD in soil
ecology, welcomed the government’s newfound commitment to monitoring soil
quality. But he said that should begin with “an England-wide measurement of
soil carbon”, investment in more research facilities and a legally binding
commitment to improving soil quality.
Clutterbuck
has calculated that Britain, which currently imports half its food, could
reduce this to around 25-30 per cent through better land management and soil
content. In turn, many countries that currently export to Britain could begin
to grow food for their own people, many of whom go hungry.
“We need
that better soil to produce more local produce to regenerate rural communities
and not fund carbon offset schemes that benefit the City,” added Clutterbuck.
Government
promises
SFI will be
phased in over seven years, while in the next three years farmers will lose
half their former EU subsidies. They mean more to smaller northern hill
farmers, earning around £25,000 annually, than larger farmers on the richer
plains in the south and east. Some farmers, many of whom have farmed for
generations, are being offered incentives to quit the land.
Critics say
this is at odds with Boris Johnson’s promise, made in 2016 at a cattle market
in Clitheroe, that farmers would get the same amount of money – “100%
guaranteed” – from subsidies after leaving the EU, while being relieved of red
tape.
The first
SFI schemes will start next spring but, according to environmental law expert
Richard Smith, “few farmers have signed up to the new programme”. Farmers’ have
low trust in Defra due to its previous management of agricultural subsidies.
A Defra
spokesperson said it was planning a “comprehensive programme of soil monitoring
across farms participating in the early roll-out. The first stage will be
establishing a baseline for a range of soil health indicators.”
The
spokesperson added: “There is a wealth of expertise in soil health within the
UK including scientists from the University of Lancaster and UK Centre for
Ecology & Hydrology.”
MARK METCALF
4 podcasts by John Smith, born 1932, a Great Yarmouth Docker
who died on 23 September 2021.
1)
The Life of a Great Yarmouth Docker
https://open.spotify.com/episode/2Jgsu60FKfEPX3BVRgZTtw
2)
From docker to branch secretary
https://open.spotify.com/episode/5fOsjcxafCOlouLXYVMtNn
3)
https://open.spotify.com/episode/7C1P6IQ7xaAg6YL5TLOAji
John Smith (RIP) – Stopping the
Job – there is power in the union.
4)
https://open.spotify.com/episode/2iL65MLvTtIHlvv6p2bsx3
The decline of the docks following the ending of the
National Dock Labour Scheme
Could it happen again?
In 1842 Britain was a society where parliament sent troops
against civilians. But parliament
understood the implications of this terrible state of affairs and from then on
has largely sought – with the exception of Ireland and which I will return to
in due course - to control protests using the police, a civil force with
coercive powers – which many people opposed - that began under Sir John Peel’s
Metropolitan Police Act 1829 and which resulted in a network of police forces
over the following quarter-century with the Lighting and Watching Act 1833, the
Municipal Corporations Act 1835 – which enabled the first local authorities to
set up borough forces, the County Police Act 1839 allowed the provincial
counties to do the same, the City of London Act 1839 similar, The Town Police
Clauses Act 1847 clarified police powers and in 1856 the County and Borough
Police Act required all local councils to establish forces.
The police had, of course, demonstrated by 1833 that it was
capable of spying on political activists and acting brutally as was the case at
the Cold Bath Fields Meeting, declared illegal by the Home Secretary Lord
Melbourne, of the National Political Union of the Working Classes.
Since then, any regular protestor will tell you that they
expect the police to misbehave on protests, that in fact there has always been
a shared understanding between police and protestors that the police will
resort to unlawful violence at political protests.
Even the Countryside Alliance supporters in 2001 found
themselves being roughed up outside Parliament when they protested against Tony
Blair’s plans, forced on him due to popular pressure, to outlaw fox hunting
with hounds. The attacks on women who
attended the vigil earlier this year for Sarah Everard, murdered by the police,
came as no surprise to many people.
Returning to the past, on Sunday 13 November 1887, the Met
deployed military tactics to prevent a demonstration in support of Home Rule in
Trafalgar Square on what became known as Bloody Sunday. 2000 police officers,
backed up by troops and cavalry prevented a quarter of a million people
protesting and 200 afterwards required hospital treatment. Later many members
of the public sought to bring charges of assault against 34 officers.
At the start of the 20th century – November 1910
- the police acted violently and also indecently assaulted numerous members of
the Women’s Social and Political Union whose actions included disorder and violence when seeking to breach
police lines to gain entry to the House of Commons In total 296 women were
arrested. All but 52 defendants later had their charges dropped. The Home
Secretary Sir Winston Churchill later refused to hold a public inquiry into
events.
Of course, the military were still during this period used
where necessary. The Featherstone Massacre of 1893 during the national lock out
of miners:-
Here is the Guardian report, dripping with support for the
military. It was about nine o'clock on
Thursday night when the South Staffordshire detachment first fired on the mobs
which were besieging the colliery of Lord Masham and were charging the soldiers
with stones. The first shot was only by one file of two men, and these did not
take effect. Shortly before ten o'clock one section of the Staffordshires fired
two volleys.
So far as could be ascertained seven of the mob were hit.
James Gibbs, of Loscoe, was shot through the breast, and expired. James
Perkins, knee shot away, died yesterday.
A sculpture was unveiled at Featherstone in 1993 marking the
centenary of "the Featherstone massacre", in which it says two miners
died.
Then, of course, there was Tonypandy in 1910 where another
joint police, involving local forces and the Met, and the army attacked
striking miners resulting in the death of Samuel Rhys, who it is believed was
hit by a police truncheon.
In August 1911, troops of the Worcestershire regiment shot
dead two striking railway workers in Llanelli where strikers, taking part in
national action, had already been brutally attacked by the police.
February 1919 – the police and military were jointly used to
suppress a strike in Glasgow for 40 hour working week.
In none of these cases did any police officer or member of
the military find themselves arrested or imprisoned.
In 1926 the army were used to break the strike by
undertaking roles vacated by strikers.
Joseph Foster, interviewed in April 2005, recalled events in
Burnhope in 1926 , when he was 14, as “being a terrible time. I saw the worst
of the strike. No clothes, no shoes, no food... families couldn’t make ends
meet.
Foster remembered an incident in which a delivery van was
tipped over by four striking miners, Ted Close, Harry Hobbs, Jim Hobbs and
Frankie Armstrong who had all been left angry after they had been forced to
dive out of the way when the van was earlier driven at them. The events led to
soldiers being sent to Burnhope. “They were walking about with bayonets, with
guns.”
There is, of course, a place little more than 100 miles from
here where British Troops have regularly been employed to put down
demonstrators marching for rights that most people would accept be granted. On
30 January 1972 the largest civil rights (organised by NICRA) march in the history
of Northern Ireland was ruthlessly suppressed with 14 killed, none of whom were
armed
Later, Lord Saville's report was made public in 2010
and concluded that the killings were "unjustified" and
"unjustifiable". It found that all of those shot were unarmed, that
none were posing a serious threat, that no bombs were thrown and that soldiers
"knowingly put forward false accounts" to justify their firing. The
soldiers denied shooting the named victims but also denied shooting anyone by
mistake. On publication of the report, British Prime Minister David Cameron made a formal apology on behalf of the
United Kingdom. Following this, police began a murder investigation into the
killings. One former soldier was charged with murder, but the case was dropped
two years later when evidence was deemed inadmissible. This is now subject to
appeal.
Bloody Sunday fuelled Catholic and Irish
nationalist hostility towards the British Army and worsened the
conflict. Support for the Provisional Irish Republican Army (IRA)
rose, and there was a surge of recruitment into the organisation, especially
locally.
Nearer to the current day, what are we to make of the fact
that during Jeremy Corbyn’s time as leader of the Labour Party we witnessed soldiers
filmed using a Jeremy Corbyn poster for target practice.
The video showed servicemen from the Colchester-based
Parachute Regiment in a shooting range, believed to be in Kabul, Afghanistan.
The soldiers were disciplined but not sacked.
No
Pasaran - James Alwyn of Bolton when to Spain to fight for democracy and lay down his life in doing so
Edward
McHugh - rediscovering a lost -working-class hero
Ellen
Strange - the light that still burns
Public Meeting
to
build for 180th anniversary commemoration in 2022
Friday 17 September 2021
7.15 pm
Maurice Jagger
Centre
junction Lister Street
& Winding Road, Halifax, HX1 1UZ
Speakers
include:
Catherine Howe Halifax born author of Halifax 1842
Matthew Roberts Sheffield Hallam University
Cllr Jenny Lynn Park Ward councillor
Mark Metcalf Halifax freelance journalist
For more information email: info@calderdaletuc.org.uk
Peterloo 1819
Halifax 1842
In August 1842, striking industrial workers in Halifax were
attacked by 150 soldiers and 200 specially sworn in constables. At least four
were killed whilst many others suffered brutal injuries that are likely to have
killed them.
Workers were participating in a nationwide general strike
that combined demands for better pay with an extension to those allowed to
vote.
Massive wage reductions over the previous two decades had
left many workers in great poverty.
At the same time only one man in seven had the right to vote
at a General Election.
The strikers called for the same right for all men, because
they believed their own parliamentary representatives would bring them some
control over the laws under which they lived: laws fashioned to protect
property and profit.
In the 179 years since that atrocity of 1842, what has
changed for the people of Halifax?
The wealth gap between rich and poor is still here. In recent
years it has widened under both Labour and Tory Governments.
Workplaces were hazardous in the 1800s yet are still not
safe. We have had a disproportionately
high number of COVID deaths in front line workers, and deaths from accidents
continue because of cost cutting by employers who ignore Health & Safety
laws.
Our environment has greatly changed due to
industrialisation. Climate change needs
measures taken that do not simply make ordinary people pay for polluting companies
going green.
Housing costs – whether to buy or rent have risen sharply.
Many young people still have no chance of owning their own home.
Unionisation is no longer a prosecutable offence but today there is still employer and government hostility to the existence of trades unions with Amazon being the latest major company to refuse to allow unions to organise employees.
Tax avoidance is still a fundamental issue with many major
companies such as Amazon failing to pay their fair share.
As in 1842, new technology threatens us with
unemployment: driverless cars and
automation mean millions face being out of work.
We have our NHS but it is facing privatisation with citizens
paying exorbitantly for the building of Calderdale Royal Hospital because it
was built using expensive private finance.
Today we have a national pension scheme but the state pension
age has been increased. Capped pay rises (and pay freezes) for public sector
workers also result in lower pensions on retirement.
Many of us enjoy the benefit of university education but
students now pay for higher education and once they are saddled with debt, many
cannot find decent jobs.
Sexism and racism are no longer left unchallenged as they
once were but legislation is hard to enforce. Women should be safe. Ethnic
minorities should be empowered to effectively challenge discrimination. The
prosecution of attackers should be vigorously pursued.
Today, soldiers are not employed against demonstrators but
there is an increasing militarisation of the police whose powers to prevent
effective protests including strike action are set to be strengthened through
the Policing Bill.
As in 1842 we still live in a society organised on the basis
of profit before people.
We will not forget what happened in Halifax in 1842. We will
campaign for the changes needed for a better, fairer, more equal society.
A Rough Jersey documentary of 18 minutes in length on how the oldest site in the world to commemorate a domestic violence victim is providing inspiration for campaigners today:-
https://vimeo.com/580567569/24ddede94c
Stanley Taggart; an ordinary man on an extraordinary day –
a Unite booklet by Mark Metcalf
When the spectre of fascism came marching into Stockton in
September 1933 it aroused great passion and anger. Ordinary people recognised
that fascism would destroy democracy, the trade union and labour movement,
create a permanent one-party state, crush individual identity and force the
individual to serve the interests of the state. It would lead to genocide and
the persecution of minorities and women.
The story of Stanley Taggart is a
story of an ordinary man, who did something extraordinary. It’s often said that
history is made by the acts of extraordinary individuals, yet it is ordinary
people standing together who really make the difference as Bertolt Brecht
points out in his fantastically powerful poem, A Worker Reads History – “Each
page a victory, at whose expense, the victory ball? Every ten years a great
man, who paid the piper?”
The story of a rank-and-file trade unionist, a
member of the T&G, (predecessor union to Unite), is the story of us all.
I’m sure on that far off morning in September 1933, when Stanley woke up, there
must have been a slight temptation to roll back over in bed or choose to do
other things that day. Many of us confronted by the choice of taking a stand
against injustice, or simply going about our normal daily business, choose the
latter.
Stanley Taggart alongside several
thousand other local people, when asked by their grandchildren, “what did you
do when the fascists came to our town?” was able to stand proud in the
knowledge that he wasn’t passive, that he didn’t choose to leave it to others,
but that he went out to stop them from spreading their messages of hate and
division.
There are lessons for us all in
Stanley’s story. It’s often said that evil succeeds when good people fail to
stand up to challenge it. When we decide whether to attend that demo, to join
that picket line or go to that rally, we place ourselves in history. When we
are asked by our grandchildren what we did to stand up to far-right extremism,
we need to have a tale or two to tell.
stanley-taggart-book-final.pdf
(wordpress.com)
NEW ROUTES TO RECONNECTION
Disabled people enjoy North’s sensory walks
Big Issue North article
An organisation that runs sensory walks for disabled people
is launching a third northern route after the success of its first two in
Yorkshire.
Sense, a charity that supports people with complex
disabilities to communicate, learn and develop, has been connecting them to
nature on routes in Rotherham and the woodland, play areas and green spaces of
West Bank Park in York.
The people it supports include those who struggle to respond
to information from senses such as sounds, sights, smells, textures and taste.
Stunning colours
Working with mapping agency Ordnance Survey, Sense’s walks
“provide an opportunity to engage with the outdoors in meaningful ways, at the
same time as supporting people to be active”, according to Alissa Ayling,
Sense’s head of sport and physical activity.
Two disabled people who enjoyed the Rotherham sensory walk
are hoping that Sense, partnering with the national mapping agency Ordnance
Survey, can build similar projects across the region.
Afzal, aged 41, from Rotherham, is a wheelchair user with
arthritis and Crohn’s disease. With the help of his support worker Michaela, he
did the sensory walk around the town’s Clifton Park, starting at its museum and
going on to the gardens and playgrounds. It has wooded areas for shade in the
summer and stunning colours in autumn.
“It allowed me to take a trip down memory lane,” said Afzal.
“Before my health deteriorated, I loved walking around the park as it’s close
to home and I enjoy being out in the community. Clifton Park is one of
Rotherham’s best features.”
Sense was formed in 1955 by two mothers who gave birth to
deaf and blind babies after contracting rubella when they were pregnant. Its OS
Maps app routes for the sensory walks come with accessibility information,
including key milestones and sensory highlights, and are available via the free
OS Maps App. Each walk has been established with the help of local walk leaders
or groups.
Rajab is another fan of the Clifton Park walk. His carer
Neil Davis uses sign language and clear speech to communicate with Rajab. Davis
said when he asked Rajab if he would like to go to the park, “he gave a big
thumbs up and immediately put his coat on”.
Rajab’s response at the end of the walk – after he had
enjoyed the scents, textures and colours of the plants, the sound of falling
water and an outdoor exercise area with walk machines – was the same.
One slight negative, according to Afzal, is the steep
incline on the return to the museum. But he added: “It was really enjoyable and
has been planned well as you can get to see most areas of the park. I love
being out in the open air and being able to go on similar walks somewhere else
other than my local park would be nice. I am sure disabled people in other
towns would welcome similar opportunities.”
Sense is about to launch a third walk, in Cumbria, with the
help of Forestry England. Paul Downes, Sense sport and physical activity
organiser in northern England, added: “There are plans for new walks to be
mapped in the North Yorkshire area with the help of volunteer walk leaders from
the Woodland Trust.”
He appealed for anyone who would like to help plot sensory
walks to make contact.
GROSS EXPLOITATION
The Scottish govt’s seasonal workers pilot
scheme exposes a depressing picture
A report into the operations in Scotland of the
Seasonal Workers Pilot (SWP), launched by the government in April 2019, that
brings temporary agricultural workers from outside the EU, exposes a depressing
picture of gross exploitation.
Unique
The Focus on Labour Exploitation (FLEX) and Fife
Migrants Forum (FMF) report into the horticultural sector is the first ever
independent evidence of worker experiences on seasonal agricultural workers
schemes.
Between 1943 and 2014 the Home Office ran the Seasonal
Agricultural Workers Scheme. Throughout the 71-year period no independent
reports based on interviews with participating workers were undertaken, a sure
sign of how little successive government’s cared about some of the most
vulnerable workers in the country.
In the lead up to the UK’s exit from the EU
there were concerns that the agricultural sector was suffering a shortfall in
workers, resulting in crops being left unharvested.
To solve these problems the SWP
was introduced. It began with an annual quota of 2,500 workers, increasing to
10,000 in 2020 and 30,000 this year – when it was opened to workers from EU
countries. Ukrainians have made up by far the largest group of SWP workers.
Funded by the Scottish Government, the research by FLEX,
assisted by an independent expert on labour exploitation, Caroline Robertson,
benefitted enormously from the experiences of two FMF caseworkers who had
previously been seasonal agricultural workers in Scotland and who later undertook
academic research qualifications. 146 SWP agricultural workers responded to
information requests.
Until May 2021, recruitment for the SWP jobs was undertaken
by Concordia and Pro-Force Ltd. Migrant workers who are offered posts must fund
their own travel costs plus a £244 visa fee. Costs average out at around £900 for
each migrant worker. Many are forced to borrow this money from black market
sources.
Many workers complained of discrepancies between the
information they received before travelling and the nature of the work they
were actually required to undertaken on arrival. Documents are rarely
translated into mother tongue languages.
Unsafe caravan accommodation, which is exempt from local
authority licensing and must be paid for even if there is no work, and the use
of zero hours contracts, combined with payment by piece rates, paints a
depressing picture made worse by deportation threats by some employers and the
impossibility of finding alternative employment.
The report authors state it ‘identifies a serious risk that
forced labour could take place on the SWP if action is not taken.’
They want the UK and
Scottish Governments to consider a lengthy series of recommendations. They include removing the visa fee and ensuring
workers get a guaranteed minimum weekly income of £332.50 for 35 hours a week.
Increasing resources
to the Gangmasters and Labour Authority, which has just one staff member in Scotland,
is required and there should be new regulations relating to piece rate calculations.
An independent helpline with translation into workers’ languages would allow
them to raise potential labour abuse. The Scottish Government is asked to offer
financial support to migrant community organisations and trade unions.
The Assessment of the risks of human trafficking on UK
Seasonal Workers Pilot report is at:-
Northern Ireland agriculutral wages board threatened
Young English workers paid less
Landworker magazine for Tolpuddle Festival
With agricultural workers, especially those under 22, across
England continuing to be worse off than their UK counterparts it is vital that
UNITE defeats proposals by the Northern Ireland executive to abolish their own Agricultural
Wages Board. (AWB)
The England and Wales AWB was scrapped by the Con-Dem coalition government in 2013. Agricultural workers in England faced being paid less than those in Scotland and Northern Ireland, which have had their own AWB’s, on which Unite represents agricultural workers, since 1949 and 1977 respectively.
The move left thousands of workers in Wales and England
without union representation over wages and conditions and with no way of
knowing when they might next receive a pay increase.
In Wales there was a devolved assembly Labour Government which
fought a successful legal battle that allowed it to establish a dedicated Wales
AWB, (officially known as the Agricultural Advisory Panel for Wales) on which
Unite sits, to protec
English workers again lose out
On 1 April 2021, the minimum hourly rate for all Scottish agricultural
workers, irrespective of age and duties became £8.91, which is the national
minimum wage (NMW) rate across the UK
for 23-year-olds. In Wales those aged 16 to 20 are paid £7.84 hourly and those
aged 21-22 get £8.36. In Northern Ireland, a minimum hourly rate of £6.95 is
paid for the first 40 weeks of employment which rises to a minimum of £7.49 an
hour for workers aged under 23.
In comparison to these AWB negotiated rates, young
agricultural workers in England are only covered by the NMW hourly rates of
£4.62 for under 18s, £6.56 for 18- to 20-year-olds and £8.36 for those aged 21
and 22.
A 20-year-old in Scotland is thus guaranteed £356.40 for a
40-hour working week, in Northern Ireland it is £299.60 and in Wales the figure
is £313.60. The sum in England is £262.40, considerably less than elsewhere. The
differences for a young person in England aged 18 or under is even greater. It
is hardly surprising that young workers in England are not considering entering
the agricultural sector.
AWBs also cover pay for workers or all ages in lieu of
wages, sick pay, holiday pay, piece rates, overtime rates at 1.5 times the
standard rate and it limits deductions for accommodation to a flat rate and
which in Northern Ireland is £45 weekly.
UNITE’s predictions were correct
The drop in living standards for agricultural workers in
England is exactly what UNITE predicted eight years ago.
A UNITE survey in 2014 found that just 56 per cent of those
previously covered by the AWB had had a pay rise. This was despite a third
asking for one. Those that did get a pay rise had received less than the whole
economy average. Eighty two per cent had any pay rise imposed by their
employer, destroying the government and employers earlier claims that
abolishing the AWB would free employees to conduct individual negotiations with
their employer.
The survey also revealed that no sick pay was being paid by
some employers, who had also added an extra hour to the working week before
overtime was paid.
Nick Clegg and David Cameron
attacked pay and conditions
The history of the AWB can be traced back to the radical,
reforming Liberal government in the years leading up to WWI. In his role as
Deputy Prime Minister from 2010 to 2015, the Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg propped up the austerity programme
of David Cameron and George Osborne and helped scrap a board that even Margaret
Thatcher retained.
Clegg, who is now Vice‑President for Global Affairs and
Communications at Facebook, was knighted for his services in the 2017 New Year
Honours list. He should never be forgiven for attacking agricultural workers
throughout England.
Northern Ireland fears
In Northern Ireland the AWB is the final collective
bargaining mechanism with a responsibility for private sector workers. As the
evidence from England since 2013 demonstrates its abolition will ”open the door
to a post-Brexit race-to-the-bottom on workers’ and farmers’ pay and
conditions” states the UNITE regional officer Sean McKeever.
In January, the Northern Ireland (NI) Department of
Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs Minster Edward Poots of the
Democratic Unionist Party announced his intention to end the NI AWB that covers
over 11,000 agricultural sector employees. Poots is a member of the Ulster
Farmers’ Union (UFU) which champions the interests of big ranchers and the
agri-food bosses.
At the NI AWB meeting in March, Sean McKeever,
unsuccessfully pressed UFU representatives to retain the AWB. “There is a
particular need for a collective bargaining body covering agricultural field
workers………the sector receives a huge amount of public funds ..it is one which
is inherently difficult to organise given the scattered distribution of workers
and the prevalence of part-time working……..
“The AWB is of vital importance in countering exploitation,
which all too often includes the practice of trafficking and modern-day slavery
– especially as many are migrant workers
with little other protection.”
Abolishing the AWB in
Northern Ireland will also offer further encouragement to the National
Farmers Union in Scotland who are known to favour abolishing the board
there.
Defend and extend the Northern
Ireland AWB
UNITE is strongly opposing the proposals to scrap the NI
AWB. See:- https://www.unitetheunion.org/campaigns/stormont-hands-off-our-farm-workers/
The union has written to the leaders of all political
parties to oppose abolition.
If you live in Northern Ireland please send a message to
your MLA demanding their party stands up for agricultural field and farm
workers and use their Ministerial veto, which is what former Agricultural
Minister Michelle Gildernew did in 2007, when it was first proposed to scrap
the AWB. Details on this can be accessed by the link above.
According to agricultural science worker and Unite member Charlie
Clutterbuck the absence of hedgerows and soil in the government’s post-Brexit
vision is a sign that any hopes of a rural revitalisation are likely to fall on
stony ground.
Relatively unsung by nature lovers and Romantic poets, hedgerows are a
fundamental aspect of the British countryside.
Hedgerows come in many shapes and sizes, the best ones for wildlife
being broadest at the bottom with woody species such as hawthorn, hazel and
field maple. Hedges provide shelter and nesting opportunities for woodland and
farmland birds. Nectar, berries, nuts and leaves are food for mammals, birds
and invertebrates. They can also help reduce soil erosion and water run-off on
arable land. According to Natural England, hedgerows also preserve carbon
stocks and wildlife that may have taken centuries to develop.
“A romantic view”
Historically, hedgerows were planted to show ownership boundaries. Many
were laid on common land during the enclosures beginning in the 18th century to
exclude people who previously used the land. In the 1980s, the EU’s Common
Agricultural Policy encouraged farmers to pull them down by offering subsidies
to make fields bigger. It proved disastrous, with the loss of 23 per cent of
hedgerows during the decade.
But Charlie Clutterbuck, who first began writing for the National Union
of Agricultural and Allied Workers in the 1970s, believes Boris Johnson’s
statement that “we will use the new freedoms we have after leaving the EU
Common Agricultural Policy to support farmers to beautify the landscape”
excludes hedgerow restoration and is instead a call for big vistas, reservoirs
and rivers.
“It is a romantic view of the countryside, which, sadly appears to have
the backing of many environmental organisations.” said Clutterbuck. “You would
imagine hedgerows should be in there somewhere – most people would back this –
but I have yet to see any words confirming this. Johnson is playing to the
City, to big finance who are being invited to make bids under the new Natural
Environment Investment Readiness Fund (NEIRF).”
Government regulations in 1997 sought to reverse the loss of hedgerows,
preventing their removal without local planning permission. The EU also sought
to repair some of the damage by later introducing ecological focus areas that
included hedgerows.
Funding cuts
Anecdotal evidence suggests the total amount of hedgerows, estimated at
402,000 km across England in 2007, has stabilised, but there is no official
data.
Clutterbuck is himself part of a Ribble Valley consortium NEIRF bid led
by the Larder Project in Preston, which includes key organisations such as the
National Farmers Union. NEIRF will provide natural capital grants of between
£10,000 and £100,000 to “people interested in tackling climate change, creating
and restoring habitats or improving water quality”.
But he says government guidelines on these improvements do not include
aspects such as hedgerows and soil health. Instead, he said much of the money
on the bid he worked on is set aside for consultants at £500- £600 a day.
“Money that once went direct to farmers through Countryside Stewardship
Schemes is being replaced by the Sustainable Farming Initiative but half of
this funding, around £2 billion, will be cut and replaced by schemes that the
government has yet to announce, which will be based on NEIRF ideas.
“These consultants will be focused on attracting large scale funding,
whereas in the past farmers big or small got direct payments. Jobs will be
lost.
“I fear that attracting large-scale private sector investment will mean
large[1]scale landscape picture box projects rather than a working countryside.
“As such a good number are likely to be rewilding and tree plantation projects,
neither of which will, after an initial boost, provide long-term employment for
local people. “
Clutterbuck is not totally opposed to tree plantations but would much
prefer to see priority given to locations such as river banks where trees can
hold the soil, thus helping to control water flow and possibly prevent
flooding.
Over 200 NEIRF bids have been submitted this year and the 100 or so who
have been successful will be notified in July.
” A Defra spokesperson said: “Our new schemes will enable us to reward
the work farmers do to manage every metre of hedgerows on their holdings’
sustainability.” But she did not provide any guarantees that any NEIRF projects
would include hedgerows.
She did not respond when asked whether funds will be used to pay
consultants rather than farmers and farm labourers.
Perhaps the most important aspect of hedgerows is not what we can see
above ground, but what is going underground. So often forgotten, soils, are vital to ‘regenerating’ our farming. Regenerative
means improving soils, so building from the ground up. Improved soils do more
for reducing global warming than any other measure. This is not just because
they can hold a lot more carbon than they are now, but they can hold water,
enabling more plants to grow. This keeps the temperatures of the earth lower,
and should be built into any climate change scheme.
Hedgerows provide deeper rooting systems, so that water runs down the
roots instead of running off the land. They will play a vital part in
natural flood management, where – by holding water – they can control erosion
of land and faster flowing rivers causing erosion and silting up.
The loss of hedgerows in the eastern part of England and where there are
now vast plains of monocrops with no hedgerows has led to the erosion of 2
million tons from our best groundwater-dependent ecosystems/land into the North
Sea. That – our most valuable asset of any – cannot come back. It is a man-made
disaster that will hurt future generations.
“Hedgerows not only create that classic British scene, they also protect
our most important asset, our soil, “ said Clutterbuck. “ Marx said that the
source of all our wealth is labour and soil. Let’s value both more. We need to
regenerate our soils to protect our environment better and so that they can
provide better living for those working the land and those of us eating off it.
“That old EU subsidy money should be going to paying workers a decent
living wage to regenerate the land, as I proposed in Bittersweet Brexit: The
Future of Food, Farming, Land & Labour.”
In Charlie’s book he outlines how the £3bn annual subsidy that was paid
out under the EU’s CAP, most of which subsidised large landowners, should, by
providing an annual subsidy of £10,000 per job, be switched towards creating
300,000 new rural, decently paid land-based jobs.